The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is planning to separate its overseas medical and agricultural missions from the operations of the International Cooperation and Development Foundation (ICDF). Overseas medical projects will be directly handled by the ministry, while agricultural assistance projects will be handled by the Council of Agriculture.
At the foundation's fifth anniversary on July 1, its secretary general, Loh Ping-cheung (羅平章), stressed that it would never violate the government's diplomatic and foreign policies. Conflicts between the foundation and the ministry (which acts as its supervisor), however, have been frequent. The ministry wants to fully coordinate aid work with the government's diplomatic work, to help the implementation and expansion of foreign relations. But many of the government's extremely "political" foreign aid policies have worsened the conflicts between the two.
Taiwan's allies are mostly under-developed countries. Political and economic development in these countries lag far behind the developed world, as they heavily emphasize "rule by man" (as opposed to the rule of law). Naturally, to win over the people in power in those countries seems to be the best way to gain speedy, short-term results. But those familiar with international aid projects hope to truly benefit aid recipient countries and their people by maximizing the results. This is achieved by professionally evaluating and closely supervising these aid projects.
The ministry has its own difficulties, but we should still value the ICDF's more substantial perspective and hope that Taiwan's foreign aid work can continue to be integrated and handled by this more professional and experienced body.
Take Senegal for example. Taiwan and Senegal resumed diplomatic links in January 1996. Last year Senegal underwent its first transition of power in several decades -- when the Senegalese Democratic Party (PDS) replaced the Socialist Party as the ruling party. Even before its election victory, the PDS, which had amicable relations with Beijing, vowed to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan in favor of China.
After the PDS took office, many believed that Taiwan-Senegal relations were more or less unsalvageable. Our diplomats, nevertheless, immediately compiled information on Taiwan's aid to Senegal over the past four years and mailed it to all Senegalese leaders. They also tried to visit every Cabinet minister in person to seek support. As a minister later said, the contribution Taiwan has made in the past few years greatly surpassed the contribution from some major countries over the past few decades. As a result, bilateral relations have gradually stabilized.
Senegal President Abdoulaye Wade visited Taiwan earlier this month and signed a joint communique with President Chen Shui-bian (
This example clearly shows the importance of more substantial and practical foreign aid work. Diplomatic ties without deep groundwork cannot stand the test of time. We should insist on promoting regular and substantial foreign aid work to those countries unsure about their position toward Taiwan, in order to attract them little by little.
The foreign ministry must acquire a broader vision. It should trust the ICDF's substantial and practical foreign aid work. It should also provide the foundation with necessary resources in order to promote our foreign aid work. Otherwise, Taiwan may still suffer from a diplomatic downturn after spending big money overseas. Our "dollar diplomacy" may even become "spendthrift diplomacy."
Tu Jenn-hwa is an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of National Development, National Taiwan University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers