What to do to invigorate the economy? Cut government expenditure, clean up banks' bad loans, privatize state-owned enterprises, set limits on government debt, balance the budget? All of those ideas were in a draft proposal for economic reforms given to the Japanese government last Thursday by a panel called the Economic and Fiscal Policy Council. This latest prescription for Japan's economic woes is sound advice for Taiwan as well.
Taiwan has closely followed Japan's footsteps in terms of economic development -- and economic woes. Japan's economy has been in the doldrums for a decade now, not because the Japanese do not know how to reform, but because their politicians enjoy a cozy, privileged, money-politics lifestyle so much that none have wanted to rock the boat by favoring painful economic reforms. Prime minister after prime minister promised the moon, but when push came to shove, none could or would try to put those plans into action.
Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's administration is the first one to be honest about the country's dire straits, telling the public that they will have to brace for painful reforms before the economy will recover. During last weekend's elections for the Tokyo metropolitan assembly, voters showed their confidence in Koizumi's government by giving it majority support.
Of course, there are also differences between the economies of Taiwan and Japan. First of all, Taiwan faces the threat of a Chinese military attack, so national security is a high priority in formulating economic policy. Japan can develop its economy freely without any such worries. Japan also has a parliamentary government system where the executive and legislative powers are unified. The Koizumi government's public support rating stands at more than 80 percent -- something it can utilize in its push for economic reforms. Taiwan's government is closer to a semi-presidential system and there is a great deal of confusion about the presidential, executive and legislative powers. The Executive Yuan is shackled by the legislature. Political instability is a major hindrance to economic reform efforts.
The people of Taiwan have very high expectations of the consultative economic conference set for this August. But government agencies are already coming up with their own economic and financial reform measures, including six financial reform bills, increased government investments and accelerated privatization of state-owned enterprises, etc. The overall direction of these measures are the same as the Japanese economic reform plan, but the spirit behind them is quite different.
Japan's plan was formulated by the prime minister's economic panel and the cabinet has reached a consensus on the content of the plan. In Taiwan, the reform measures are being proposed by different agencies. There is a lack of coordination that could lead to conflicting objectives and disagreement between agencies. For example, the government has asked the banks not to tighten their credit criteria, but it also wants the banks to quickly clean up their bad loans. The government wants quick privatization of state-owned enterprises, but it is also worried about layoffs and increased unemployment. Interest rates have been lowered again and again, but the government is also worried about inflation. The government wants to cut taxes, yet it wants to spend NT$810 billion on public investment projects -- no surprise, therefore, that financial officials have warned of an increasingly serious budget imbalance.
It is unrealistic to pin one's hopes on the August conference, which is likely to become a venue for partisan bickering since decision-making will be by consensus. Political compromise will prevail over the integrity of concepts and proposals. At best, the conference will only showcase a political truce made for the sake of the economy. If the government wants real economic reforms it must first reform itself.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers