Last week, the UN forum on global warming announced a new compromise plan in an attempt to jump-start negotiations for the 1997 Kyoto Protocol on global warming. The Kyoto Protocol suffered a devastating setback after US President George W. Bush declared that the US was withdrawing from the accord because it harmed the US economy and treated developed countries with prejudice. We want to appeal to President Bush to use the opportunity to seriously reconsider rejoining the protocol. Otherwise the US, at least when it comes to protection of the environment, risks becoming a "rogue state" no different from China.
While China is undoubtedly a "rogue state" when it comes to issues concerning basic human rights and Taiwan, the US should get off its high horse when it comes to environmental conservation. Statistics indicate that the US has just six percent of the world's total population, yet it produces 25 percent of the world's carbon dioxide, a major cause of the rapid reduction of the ozone layer and the greenhouse effect.
Problems in the environment in most instances have a long-term impact across national borders and in fact, across the globe. A case in point was the "super sandstorm" sweeping across Taiwan these past few days. The sandstorm was generated in China's Gobi desert, yet it is expected to hit the Korean Peninsula, Japan and even places as far away as Alaska and the Arctic.
Similarly, and on an even greater scale, the global warming produced by the greenhouse effect impacts every country. In this kind of situation, the interests of individual states, including their economic interests, are not legitimate bases for declining participation in international efforts to combat global warming. No wonder many European governments have warned that the US decision could harm US relations with the rest of the world.
Most Americans seem to understand, perhaps better than President Bush, what is at stake here. A recent Time-CNN poll, taken after the announced withdrawal from the protocol, indicated that 75 percent of Americans considered global warming a serious problem, and 66 percent said that President Bush should develop a plan to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
Since President Bush has vowed to continue cooperating with US allies to reduce the greenhouse effect, why not start by negotiating for possible compromises on the Kyoto Protocol? It just may save years of effort and negotiations already put into the protocol from going down the drain. In view of the premature death of the International Trade Organization and other international agreements caused by the lack of US participation, the Kyoto Protocol is likely to suffer the same fate unless the world's sole remaining superpower gets back on board.
President Bush's main objection to the Kyoto Protocol was the discrepancy between developed and developing nations. Industrialized countries are required to cut carbon dioxide emissions by an average of 5.2 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. Yet, the protocol does not require emissions cuts by developing countries such as China, which are the fastest-growing emitters of greenhouse gases. However, the new proposal by the UN forum on global warming would appear to somewhat address this concern by allowing developed countries to pay for "sinks" -- forests and farmlands capable of absorbing carbon dioxide emissions -- in other nations and claim credits toward their own targets laid out in the protocol.
The new UN proposal appears to give the US another chance to join the protocol. We can only hope that President Bush makes an effort to reach a compromise on the substantive terms of the protocol, so as to avoid turning the US into an environmental "rogue state."
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US