On March 24, KMT Chairman Lien Chan
The question of whether the KMT can be reborn through its internal reforms after losing power to the DPP will certainly have a significant bearing on the future of politics in Taiwan. In the past year, however, the KMT's reforms have failed to impress the public and its support rate and image have not improved either. Although recent opinion polls show that people's satisfaction with the government's performance has dropped to a new low, the KMT's support rate is still the lowest of all the major parties. Public dissatisfaction with the DPP has not benefited the KMT.
Lien came up with a beautiful slogan in his recent campaign ad: "The KMT has to make a good showing so that the hard times can pass." But the question of how the people will judge the KMT's reform attempts will soon be answered in the year-end elections.
We all know that "black gold"politics are the KMT's biggest burden. If the party wants to boost its support, it must apply the right remedy to the disease and should no longer be overcautious and indecisive.
Following the election for chairman, the KMT's most important task is to successfully carry out its party primaries. The KMT must first prove to the public that these primaries are for real and that the case of Deputy Secretary-General Jason Hu (胡志強) -- who registered as a candidate for both Taipei County Commissioner and Taichung City Mayor under pressure from KMT officials -- will never be repeated.
Second, the KMT should insist on compliance with Article 9, or the so-called "anti-black gold" article, of the party's regulations for nomination of candidates for public office. There should be no room for compromise.
Third, the KMT must ensure that if vote-buying is discovered during the primaries, those candidates who buy votes should not be pardoned nor shown leniency.
Only by showing its determination to have clean primaries can the KMT be reborn and present a fresh, new look to the people of Taiwan. Will the party be reborn from the ashes, or will it continue to drink from the poisoned chalice and embrace black gold? That is the KMT's real challenge after its election for chairman.
Wang Yeh-lih is chairman of the department of political science at Tunghai University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers