In the 1981 local government elections, Chiang Tsung-jen (江聰仁), then township chief of Kungkuan (公館) township, Miaoli County, insisted on running for the post of Miaoli County Commissioner, thereby posing a serious threat to Hsieh Chih-ting (謝金汀), who had been nominated by the KMT. Both then-KMT heavyweight Sung Shih-hsuan (宋時選) and the KMT's youth commission chief at that time, Lien Chan (連戰), who had been a classmate of Chiang at National Taiwan University, tried to convince him to change his registered domicile in order to get him disqualified from the election.
According to Chiang's biography, "the KMT ordered the Kungkuan Household Registration Office to be opened especially for me on Retrocession Day, a national holiday. But I insisted on not withdrawing from the election ...."
Traditionally, the KMT has used a variety of tricks, including money or political pressure, to carry out its wishes and clear away any obstacles in elections.
Compared to those tricks, the method used in the Chiang case -- trying to manipulate the local administration office -- seems to be a minor one. I also believe that the KMT, at that time, had no sense of guilt about its wrongdoing since it was common for it to manipulate such local offices 20 years ago.
The absurdity of its illegal actions, however, now appear clear and significant.
Shortly after prosecutors announced they would not indict James Soong
Because of the recent chaos in Taiwan's political scene, many people have failed to take a serious look at the case and its impact on the nation's judicial system.
Since the opposition alliance might collapse if the KMT insisted on seeking a reconsideration, some people might even feel Soong was lucky to escape prosecution. If he had not, not only might the dispute over the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant
Clearly, Taiwan's politicians have not yet realized that they are damaging the principle of judicial independence, as well as the dignity of the law by putting political considerations first.
Do they need to wait another 20 years to understand the absurdity of their actions? How could prosecutors go to Soong's home and question him there? How could prosecutors not question former president Lee Teng-hui
Theoretically, the law is always superior to politics. Thus, politicians should pursue their political ends within the confines of the law. In Taiwan, however, the tradition is that politics is above the law.
Although the people of Taiwan have a fairly high level of education and many of our politicians are highly educated, they only talk moralistically. Once the law becomes entangled with politics, their natural tendency to believe that politics is superior usually leads to the law being abused by them.
Opportunities are usually rare if we want to break a tradition. The Chung Hsing Bills
Unfortunately, the case was handled carelessly. As time goes by, the Judicial Reform Foundation's
The judicial system in Taiwan is an embarrassment today. When will it be able head to the right direction -- proudly and maturely?
Chen Ro-jinn is a freelance writer.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past