The KMT recently held a press conference to announce its decision not to pursue an indictment against James Soong (
Is the Soong case now ended because the KMT wants to wash it hands of it? Not necessarily. The spokesperson for the KMT legal team, Chang Nai-liang (
Interestingly, the reason cited by the KMT for not pursuing an indictment was that its members thought that if they continued to dwell on disputes surrounding the case, the KMT would forever remain trapped in the past. This argument is, of course, politically motivated and has nothing whatsoever to do with the truth. The true message is that KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) had opened the door of friendship for Soong. What immediately comes to mind is the connection between the decision and the two parties cooperating in the year-end elections.
The People's First Party and the KMT have been the fiercest of rivals so far. So the explanation of an alliance is not that realistic. A more plausible explanation is that Lien is trying to warm up to KMT members close to Soong for next month's direct election of KMT chairman. The number of KMT members who have re-registered their membership is said to be close to 1 million. How many belong to the Lien camp, to Soong's? The KMT knows only too well. No wonder Lien did not dare to pursue Soong's indictment.
Chin Heng-wei is editor in chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers