"Rube Goldberg gets his think tank working and evolves the simplified pencil sharpener: Open window (A) and fly kite (B). String (C) lifts small door (D) allowing moths (E) to escape and eat red flannel shirt (F). As weight of shirt becomes less, shoe (G) steps on switch (H) which heats electric iron (I) and burns hole in pants (J). Smoke (K) enters hole in tree (L), smoking out opossum (M) which jumps into basket (N), pulling rope (O) and lifting cage (P), allowing woodpecker (Q) to chew wood from pencil (R), exposing lead."
There is a cartoon that illustrates this "solution" to pencil sharpening. Use your mind's eye to envision it. The cartoonist who created this, and many similar, solutions to practical problems was Rube Goldberg (1883-1970).
Goldberg was a Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist born in San Francisco. His most famous work was the cartoon series "Inventions," an example of which opened this article. The "Invention" cartoon always used a string of outlandish tools, people, plants and animals to accomplish everyday simple tasks in the most complicated ways. Goldberg was a master at discovering harder ways to achieve easy results.
Goldberg would have made an excellent presidential advisor, much better than Lee Yuan-tseh
Whether we should or should not have the plant is not the issue of this commentary -- it is the Goldberg approach that has been taken towards that subject and others. I would hope that the phrase "Rube Goldberg" enters local political analysis because it is a very apt, very useful phrase to describe Taiwan political "reasoning." I should mention that the phrase "Rube Goldberg" is in most American dictionaries.
It is an unfortunate reality that politics here is largely one huge Rube Goldberg "solution" after another. What is funny in a cartoon strip is not so funny in real life. Such "solutions" in Taiwan get people killed, waste huge amounts of money and reduce the strength, vitality and competitiveness of this nation.
It is a never ending source of amazement to me how the Taiwanese political structure can find the most convoluted solution to the most mundane task. That "ability" extends from the president down to the lowest level clerk in this country. If this nation intends to remain competitive internationally, if it intends to further progress towards being a modern democracy, if it intends to avoid just becoming a forgotten backwater somewhere in Asia; then this nation would do well to stop relying on a Rube Goldberg approach to problem solving.
As for the fourth plant, here is a solution. After spending millions of dollars in previous years (A), the president makes a campaign promise to stop construction (B). After the election, the president cancels construction (C), the Legislative Yuan demands reversal of decision (D), the Council of Grand Justices takes case under review (E), gives nonsense, non-reply (F). The Legislative and Executive Yuans duke it out (G). In a reversal, the president offers to mediate (H). There is talk of a referendum (I). The president tries to sell his party on idea of restarting construction (J) ... to be continued.
Ah, if Rube Goldberg were still alive he could draw a great cartoon out of this.
Brian Kennedy is an attorney who writes and teaches on criminal justice and human rights issues.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers