It has been more than a month since the "small three links" were launched. China's ambiguous attitude has made many wish to jump on the band wagon sigh in disappointment while gazing at the sea. In particular, for the lunar new year, people from Kinmen who live in China still had to travel via Hong Kong or Macau to Taipei and then wait for vacancies on flights from Taipei to Kinmen.
But it appears that "the links" have not been really open. All attempts to decriminalize smuggling -- the minimum goal set by Taipei -- seem to have become futile as well. In fact, small-scale illegal trade is becoming even more rampant than before. Most fishermen from Xiamen will not be able to take part in the model of trade formulated by Taipei, even if Beijing does not object to it. The fishermen can only continue to peddle their goods as street vendors on Kinmen streets.
Because of the continuing gap between the two sides in terms of incomes and the prices of goods, and the reconciliatory atmosphere built up by the small three links, more and more peddlars are coming from China. The rush is quickly turning what used to be a seller's market into a buyer's market. The business order in Kinmen is becoming more and more chaotic, with disputes of varying sizes breaking out from time to time. Some Chinese peddlars shout at and try to provoke coast guard personnel, while others get into brawls in the fight for business, sometimes even killing their rivals.
Such episodes are a glaring contrast to the opening of the small three links. The 190-plus Kinmen residents who joined the first direct sailing to Xiamen have kept praising the city, which had been separated from Kinmen for 52 years. They said Kinmen is at least 40 years behind Xiamen when it comes to development.
But a larger number of Kinmen residents who did not join the direct sailing are witnessing -- at a much closer range along the beaches near their homes -- the dire conditions and brutality of the Chinese. So many people are taking many risks in order to sail boats to Kinmen for the sake of measly profits and a livelihood.
Apart from sympathy for those struggling to make a living, Kinmen residents are also beginning to have doubts and fears -- especially those over 60 or 70. They have opposed the small three links from the outset, due to their past experience of violence and looting coming from the other shore. Today, despite the extensive exchanges, the pernicious deeds of some Chinese along the coastline are bringing anxiety.
With Taiwan's economy remaining sluggish -- and with no other good prospects in sight for Kinmen -- most of the residents take the small three links as a panacea for the islands, even though they do not quite trust China and the links may have an impact on public security. Those obsessed with the notion of a "Greater China" have pinned their hopes for the future on China. The small three links, which have been late in coming, have eventually enabled them to properly embrace the idea of a Greater China.
No matter how Kinmen residents regard the opening of the small three links, their launch has certainly changed Kinmen's role and value in cross-strait relations. The "Kinmen frontline" has been quietly replaced by the "Penghu frontline" as Kinmen's symbolic value as a potential battleground dies away.
It is high time we readjusted the relations between Taiwan proper and Kinmen, and those between Kinmen and Xiamen as well. The discussions that surfaced in the media during the wave of small three links hype, such as "Kinmen to be kept by Xiamen," "Kinmen and Matsu to be `mainlandized,'" "Kinmen and Xiamen to jointly build a co-prosperity sphere," all assume that Kinmen will finally move to the other side of the strait. These comments, from Kinmen's government officials, local people and cross-strait observers, represent today's mainstream opinion to a considerable extent -- Kinmen will first be "linked up" with China and then"integrated" into it.
Amid the complexity of cross-strait relations, Kinmen does not appear to enjoy much self-determination about what its next step should be. China has its own calculations, after all, and Kinmen remains a member of the Taiwan-Penghu-Kinmen-Matsu community. Kinmen has been thoroughly Taiwanized.
But things unique to Kinmen still remain -- a location too close to China, more than 40 years of military restrictions that have had a deep impact on the thinking and political identity of Kinmen residents for two generations. Their painful experience of coming under artillery fire quite a few times has made Kinmen residents extremely sensitive about war and peace -- as can be glimpsed from the voters' tendencies in past elections, and from the responses to the small three links.
Seeing Kinmen gradually pushed towards (or sucked into) China may satisfy some Kinmen residents. But, if Kinmen really develops in this direction, it will be necessary to modify the "Taiwanized" thinking of Kinmen residents.
Besides, the umbilical cord connecting Kinmen and Taiwan proper is bound to wither. Kinmen's income levels, which are currently much higher than the mainland's, will shrink. Kinmen will then lose its special value across the strait. It must return to "fundamentals" and start from scratch.
After the small three links come the "big three links," and Kinmen is like a ship drifting in the sea. The residents can only pray for warmer cross-strait relations so that they may live in safety and without panic.
The important task facing us now is how properly to serve as a herald of harmony between the two sides -- instead of blindly hurrying to embrace the mainland and painting fantastic rainbows.
Chou Cheng-lai is a senior high school teacher in Kinmen.
Translated by Gatian Wang and Francis Huang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US