Taiwanese and Indian society are alike in that their people only unite when faced with major disaster. After memories of the disaster fade, their peoples soon resume their old habits of acting selfishly and only looking after their own interests.
A profound question about the two societies is: What has led them, despite their very different cultures, to the same mode of social interaction today?
One significant historical fact about India is that it is one of the few nations that enjoyed democracy before industrialization. India practices democratic politics, influenced as it has been by British colonialism. Most of the early Hindu elite, including Mahatma Gandhi, received their higher education in Great Britain and were very familiar with the way democratic politics operate. When India became an independent democratic republic, all its modes of political operation were copied from the British.
The establishment of democratic politics, however, has only helped the Indian government to partially achieve industrialization. The success of its heavy industries and aerospace technology has been of little benefit to the people's livelihood. Meanwhile, under democratic politics, government has been weak and incapable, bringing the nation greater inefficiency, corruption and a privileged class. It also failed to eradicate domestic violence caused by religious fanaticism. Most citizens still live in extreme poverty, as the disparity between the rich and the poor persists.
Taiwan chose another road, that of promoting industrialization first while gradually carrying out democratic politics. The over-emphasis on industrialization, however, cost us dearly -- both politically and socially. Taiwan experienced suppression of human rights and restrictions on the freedom of speech, as well as insufficient channels for participation in politics. The worst problem is that the "civil power" (
Meanwhile, the power of "black gold" politics (
All these problems are the result of the vertically-connected social structures of family and ethnicity, as well as the lack of a horizontally connected civil power. Taiwan has become an empty body without a soul. Although we sport the fancy clothes of freedom and democracy, underneath we are stark naked.
Although Taiwan and India have followed different development processes, the prices both have to pay today are huge due to the lack of an effective civil power within their social systems. Fortunately, historical development is not always linear and Taiwan still has a chance to right its wrongs. The only question is whether time is on our side. Do we still have time to hesitate about what moves to make?
Kuo Sheng-che is an assistant professor of social studies at Fu Hsing Kang College.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers