Taiwanese and Indian society are alike in that their people only unite when faced with major disaster. After memories of the disaster fade, their peoples soon resume their old habits of acting selfishly and only looking after their own interests.
A profound question about the two societies is: What has led them, despite their very different cultures, to the same mode of social interaction today?
One significant historical fact about India is that it is one of the few nations that enjoyed democracy before industrialization. India practices democratic politics, influenced as it has been by British colonialism. Most of the early Hindu elite, including Mahatma Gandhi, received their higher education in Great Britain and were very familiar with the way democratic politics operate. When India became an independent democratic republic, all its modes of political operation were copied from the British.
The establishment of democratic politics, however, has only helped the Indian government to partially achieve industrialization. The success of its heavy industries and aerospace technology has been of little benefit to the people's livelihood. Meanwhile, under democratic politics, government has been weak and incapable, bringing the nation greater inefficiency, corruption and a privileged class. It also failed to eradicate domestic violence caused by religious fanaticism. Most citizens still live in extreme poverty, as the disparity between the rich and the poor persists.
Taiwan chose another road, that of promoting industrialization first while gradually carrying out democratic politics. The over-emphasis on industrialization, however, cost us dearly -- both politically and socially. Taiwan experienced suppression of human rights and restrictions on the freedom of speech, as well as insufficient channels for participation in politics. The worst problem is that the "civil power" (
Meanwhile, the power of "black gold" politics (
All these problems are the result of the vertically-connected social structures of family and ethnicity, as well as the lack of a horizontally connected civil power. Taiwan has become an empty body without a soul. Although we sport the fancy clothes of freedom and democracy, underneath we are stark naked.
Although Taiwan and India have followed different development processes, the prices both have to pay today are huge due to the lack of an effective civil power within their social systems. Fortunately, historical development is not always linear and Taiwan still has a chance to right its wrongs. The only question is whether time is on our side. Do we still have time to hesitate about what moves to make?
Kuo Sheng-che is an assistant professor of social studies at Fu Hsing Kang College.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US