Joel Ducher, former Taiwan branch manager of the French bank Societe Generale, testified this week at the Paris trial of former foreign minister Roland Dumas that FF2.5 billion ($114 trillion at current exchange rates) was used for illegal commissions in the FF16 billion sale of six Lafayette frigates to Taiwan. Of this, Ducher said, FF800 million was paid to politicians and military officers in Taiwan, while the remaining FF1.7 billion flowed back to France. One-sixth of an arms sale whose contract clearly prohibits commissions was used for exactly that purpose. The vastness and complexity of the irregularities surrounding the sale can't be more obvious.
According to Ducher, the frigates were worth FF1.06 billion each -- which would set the price of the six vessels at FF6.3 billion. However, the initial price agreed between France and Taiwan was FF11 billion -- almost twice as expensive. The deal was later pumped up to FF16 billion -- both by the kickbacks and an agreement to have the ships' hulls built entirely in France. Ducher called the frigate sale a "fraud at the national level," saying the French government had allowed massive kickbacks for a transaction that clearly prohibited commissions.
His testimony has also put the sad story of Taiwan's military procurements under the international spotlight. Though known worldwide for its economic miracle and democratic reforms, Taiwan has been largely isolated by its sensitive relations with China. Beijing has tried to foil Taiwan's every attempt to buy the weapons it needs to defend itself. As a result, Taiwan not only faces great difficulty in finding weapons, but also ends up paying inordinately high prices, becoming easy prey for arms dealers.
As a free and democratic country, Taiwan has a right to the same survival space and dignity as any other democratic nation. Taiwan's military procurements are actions no less reasonable than those of any other nation. An arms-manufacturing country may like to describe weapons sales to Taiwan as a favor, but McDonnell Douglas, the manufacturer of F-16 fighter jets, might very well be undergoing major personnel layoffs today if not for its F-16 sales to Taiwan. If not for Taiwan's purchase of Lafayette frigates, Mirage-2000 fighters and missiles, the French shipbuilder Lorient might be facing closure while Dassault and Matra might be facing major layoffs. In other words, Taiwan's military purchases are mutually beneficial transactions that should not be subjected to unreasonable treatment.
The strategic balance in the western Pacific will undergo a drastic change if China gobbles up Taiwan. This is certainly not a scenario that the international community wants to see. In this sense, Taiwan's military purchases are also compatible with the interests of the global village. Countries like the US and France should not simply sit back and watch while Taiwan's military capabilities shrink -- much less take advantage of Taiwan's back-to-the wall position to jack up their prices to exorbitant levels.
For its part, Taiwan also needs to clean up its act. President Chen Shui-bian
The government should also file a lawsuit to demand compensation from Thales (formerly known as Thomson-CSF), the French manufacturer of the frigates, in the name of China Shipbuilding Corp (
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers