The recent escapades of Zhang Ying (張穎), the Chinese "magic doctor" caused me to consider the relationship between faith healing, fraud and the criminal law. Zhang had been demonstrating her supernatural healing powers around Taipei and her ability to "snatch medicine pills out of thin air." She kind of met her Waterloo however when displaying her powers on a TV show. A well known local magician challenged her abilities. Upon this challenge Zhang was unable to pull anything out of thin air, commenting: "I could not concentrate my power in the presence of someone who doubted my abilities."
I have no doubt that is true. This incident and others like it raise the somewhat thorny issue of when should the criminal justice system take over and start prosecuting people like Zhang. It is not a straightforward issue. One man's fraud is another man's faith. On a personal level I have mixed feelings. On the one hand if people are that dumb, perhaps they deserve to be parted from their money. Admittedly that is a kind of social Darwinism. I have always felt that there is a certain minimum IQ level that the public needs to meet. If they fall below that level and give people like Zhang lots of their money, then they are on their own. It is not the state's duty to guard against the public's free exercise of its stupidity. On the other hand, however, I grant no quarter to people who steal money from the sick and the old. People who prey on the fear that comes with such diseases as cancer or AIDS ought to be prosecuted and prosecuted hard. Members of the public who are genuinely sick, especially with diseases that legitimate doctors would consider untreatable, need to be protected from people like Zhang who would in essence steal their money and then leave them to die.
But the issue is perhaps not so black and white. Cases like Zhang and others of the same ilk bring together a nexus of factors. including: basic human stupidity or gullibility, human greed, religious faith and cultural views of what is "true" and what is a "lie." The following comments are not directed at the Zhang situation in particular. She seems to be nothing more than a "traveling snake oil salesman."
Like snake oil salesmen in America's "old west," she will be run out of town by the sheriff in short order. But she is simply a crude form of the phenomenon of what I will call in a generic sense "faith healing." From a criminal justice standpoint the line between fraud and faith has always been difficult to discern. That line is to a certain extent culturally bound. Let me give an example; feng shui
Faith healing and its frequent companion "qi gong"
Brian Kennedy is an attorney who writes and teaches on criminal justice and human rights issues.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US