In your recent article ("Lack of evidence flusters magazine," Jan. 9, page 1), doesn't convention have it that one is presumed innocent until proven otherwise?
Isn't it true that People First Party Legislator Chin Huei-chu (秦惠珠), in accusing President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of being in league with China, has on multiple occasions provided the "evidence" to attempt to convince the general public. I am thus somewhat bewildered by the report that The Journalist(新新聞) says it lacks proof to back up its story that Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) was spreading rumors of an affair in the Presidential Office and trying to undermine Chen. Could it be that the "credibility gap" between Yang Chao (楊照) of The Journalist and Chin is so vast that Yang can automatically be exempted from the burden of proof in providing some sort of material evidence? It seems only fair to presume that the vice president is innocent unless The Journalist can demonstrate otherwise.
Chang Tien-hsien
Columbus, Ohio
The cable TV vacuum
It seems that cable TV presents particularly large problems in Taiwan. After three years here, I have come across many of these, especially each Jan. 1.
I have never understood why the cable companies need to change all the channels each year, sometimes several times per week. This year, in the Ta-an area (
If we didn't care about illegal ads, or those small yellow messages at the top of the screen, it may be that we could say that cable TV isn't so bad in Taiwan after all. But there is another problem. Why is CNN the only foreign news channel? Where is BBC World, Australia TV, Deutsche Welle or the French TV5? Is it so hard to put them on the air? In Ta-an there are 20 vacant channels. If Taiwan wishes to enter the third millennium like a member of the international community, if Taiwanese people want to open up to other cultures, other ways of life, I think cable companies need to understand this problem. It is incredible that a person can go to Manila or Bangkok and watch all the international TV channels, but that Taiwan should be so poor in this respect.
Jerome Chaussard
Taipei
Who used whom?
Though it glossed over the significance of his Aboriginal roots, Rick Chu's piece on former Olympian Yang Chuan-kuang (
I was intrigued by Chu's assertion that the DPP "used him in turn, degrading him and turning the Iron Man into a spirit medium and so dispensed with him." Whether it is fair to imply that working as a spirit medium is the degraded outcome of disenchantment is for the reader to decide. But on the eve of the presidential election, Yang was on stage at the Chungshan Soccer Stadium, surrounded by pro-DPP Aborigines from around Taiwan, exhorting voters to support A-bian. And backstage, most of the Aborigines [at least] seemed to know who he was and were taking photos with him. This is not entirely consistent with being thrown away "like an old shoe." Things might be a little more complex than they first appear. After years of frustration with the KMT, my guess is that Yang is no fool and still had an agenda that evening, even in the face of the DPP's brittle record on Aboriginal affairs and the fact that Aboriginal voters firmly backed James Soong (宋楚瑜).
Martin Williams
Sydney, Australia
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers