For the first time ever, nearly 90 percent of the research budget of Academia Sinica has been put on hold. This, however, is one Taiwan first that doesn't deserve applause. Rather it is an act of spite by opposition lawmakers at the Legislative Yuan towards Academia Sinica President Lee Yuan-tse (
And of course it is not just Lee who suffers. The entire staff of Academia Sinica is affected by the withholding of the NT$4.4 billion budget for research projects. Nor will the impact necessarily be short term if the budget is released shortly after the new legislative session begins next month. Academia Sinica works together with other prestigious institutes around the world. Its inability to make good on research commitments can only weaken other's future interest to conduct joint research projects with Taiwan.
This act of folly indicates how talented our lawmakers are at lifting a rock only to drop it on our own toes. In other words, it is the people of Taiwan who suffer the consequences, not Lee alone. And for what? So, we have to assume, the opposition lawmakers can humiliate Lee and thereby hound him out of the political arena. Of course, they have good reason to fear Lee. He is seen as a man of impeccable integrity and enjoys the respect of almost every sector of society -- and where is the politician of whom that can be said? His theme of promoting social renaissance in the face of social decay has dealt a heavy blow to the KMT as it struggles to distance itself from "black-gold" influence, with no noticeable results so far. Naturally, Lee would function as a huge stumbling block should he blow the whistle on KMT-nominated legislative candidates in this year's elections.
Ironically, any attempt to force Lee to step down could turn out to be a dire mistake for the KMT and other opposition parties, in that, if he is relieved from official duty as the result of opposition pettiness, he is likely to be far more willing to campaign for the DPP and assist its candidates in the election -- exactly the opposite of what the KMT would like to see. Thus not only is slashing the Academia Sinica budget petty, not only does it endanger Taiwan's future, but it is liable to prove even counter-productive to the selfish political interests of those who did it.
The opposition legislators justified their behavior by saying that Lee had shown a lack of respect to the legislature by not attending a budget review session. The fact is that Lee wasn't taking a vacation but fulfilling his duty as the president of Academia Sinica by going abroad to sign research contracts with other international institutes, the date of which was scheduled before that of the budget review.
Revenge might be sweet but it is often a double-edged sword. This time, the action taken by the opposition camp is very likely to backfire. Pro-education and pro-reform voters in Taiwan will remember the opposition's spite and stupidity in the coming election, as the opposition will find to its cost.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers