Every once in a while, an American think-tank figure pops up with a new idea on how to resolve the tension across the Taiwan Strait. In early 1998, it was the Kennedy School of Government's Joseph Nye who proposed his infamous "Taiwan deal." According to Nye, Taiwan was supposed to foreswear its independence in exchange for some kind of vague "higher international profile." A year later, Kenneth Lieberthal, who recently stepped down as head of East Asian affairs on Bill Clinton's National Security Council, launched his equally noxious and onerous "interim agreement" trial balloon.
This time, David Shambaugh, a pro-China academic at the George Washington University, wrote in the January/February 2001 issue of Foreign Affairs that the concept of "confederation" offers the best hope for an ultimate solution, as "it would bring the island back into the sovereign fold of China while guaranteeing substantial autonomy to Taiwan."
First, we must point out that Shambaugh's basic premise is all wrong, since Taiwan was never in the sovereign fold of the People's Republic of China (PRC) to begin with. Certainly, the KMT came from China, but mainlanders who arrived in Taiwan along with the KMT and their descendants constitute only 15 percent of Taiwan's population.
The large majority of the people of Taiwan are native Taiwanese, and come from a background which identifies with Taiwan and rejects any sovereignty claim by China over Taiwan. When the KMT came to Taiwan under Chiang Kai-shek's (
Instead, the people of Taiwan were subjected to 38 years of martial law and oppression by the Chinese KMT. The KMT, for many years, clung to the outdated notion that they -- as the Republic of China -- were the rightful government of all of China. While the Taipei government dropped these claims in the early 1990s, Taiwan's future is being held hostage by anachronistic counterclaims across the Taiwan Strait.
Isn't it time for American scholars to stop perpetuating these outdated notions and help bring about an acceptance of Taiwan, by China and the rest of the international community, as a full and equal member of the family of nations? The most obvious -- and only fair -- resolution is to normalize relations with Taiwan and accord full diplomatic ties to a deserving nation of 23 million people.
The US and other nations need to emphasize time and again that it is the right of the Taiwanese people to determine their own future, without interference, threats or intimidation from China. And if the people of Taiwan wish to be accepted as an independent nation named "Taiwan," that choice should be respected and even applauded by the international community.
Chen Mei-chin is an editor of the Taiwan Communique
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers