I'm an election judge in Dallas County and I have been in the computer business long enough (early 1970s) to have actually used punch cards. So, here's my take on the Florida election: Machines are used for counting votes because they are much faster then humans, not because they are more accurate. The machines have a known error rate. In the case of punched card machines, it is considered to be up to five percent. For most elections, this is just fine since elections are generally decided by a margin of at least five percent. The 14,000 votes in Palm Beach County that were not counted by machine in a previous election were not hand-counted for a simple reason: the margin of votes between the candidates was greater then 14,000 votes, so, a hand-count would not affect the outcome of the election. In fact, hand-counts are only done when the hand-count could change the result of the election. In Florida, Governor Bush is ahead by approximately 1,000 votes out of approximately 6,000,000 votes cast. In other words, Bush is only ahead by 0.016 percent. In this situation, an error rate of 2 percent is well beyond precision of the counting machines. This is equivalent to a poll in which the results were 49.0 percent for Gore and 49.016 percent for Bush with a 2 percent margin of error. In other words, the election is too close to call because the margin of victory needs to be much greater then it is now for the public to have any confidence in the result without a hand-count. If Bush were ahead by 200,000 votes that would still only be a 3.3 percent margin -- just barely within the tolerance of the counting equipment. As for the hand-recount, this is a misnomer. The important ballots are not those that were counted by the counting machines. It is the ballots that were not counted because the machines could not read them that are important. The error rate on the ballots that the machines actually counted is quite low because the machines are designed to reject a ballot rather than count it incorrectly. In a sense, the error rate on the uncounted ballots is 100 percent. Many votes were rejected because the chad was pushed back into the hole when it went through the machine, or the chad was punctured instead of falling out. These ballots have never been counted -- only rejected by the machines.
The chads that are falling out are not ones where all four corners are still attached. The ballots have to be quite sturdy to withstand the punishment of being put through high speed counting machines. The chads that are falling off are ones where the chad is already partly detached. I can assure you that the people who are counting these ballots by hand are treating the ballots with kid gloves, compared to the counting machines. Far more chads fall off in the counting machines then when the ballots are counted by hand. In fact, the first time the ballots are put through the counting machine isthe time when the largest number of partly attached chads will fall off. But again, the ballots are quite sturdy. Most of the chads that fall off in the counting machines are ones that are already partly detached: the so-called hanging-door chads in which two of the four perforations are broken through. So, here's the bottom line: if 10,000 votes were not counted by the counting machines in one Florida county, this is 10 times the margin by which Bush is ahead. If only 20 percent of those votes can be discerned by manual counting, that could easily be enough to change the result of the election. The ballots used in the votamatic machines have approximately 80 locations where the card can be punched. The condition of the card material, the alignment of the card in the machine, the alignment of the voter booklet (containing the candidates' names), and even the punch location can have an impact on how the ballot responds to being punched by the stylus.
It is commonly held that the location on the ballot most difficult to punch cleanly is the four corners of the ballot. In the presidential election, the major presidential candidates were punched in punches one through five. This is the most difficult area of the ballot to get a clean punch. Dimpled chads are generally counted as votes because of the difficulty of getting a clean punch and the improbability that a dimple isn't typically created in a ballot simply by handling it. Additionally, it is highly improbable that a dimple not created by a voter would occur in the ballot in the exact punch position for a candidate in a particular race. In fact, on the typical votamatic ballot, half of the positions on the ballot are not used at all. (The candidate punch positions are spaced out over the entire ballot because spreading out the punch positions makes it easier to space the printing in the ballot book and because spreading out the punches makes it easier to get a clean punch in a particular hole. If dimples were to be created in ballots from simple handling, these dimples would randomly occur in the unused punch positions, not in the position for a particular candidate in a particular race. All of these factors combine to create the overwhelming evidence that a dimpled chad is actually a vote. For this reason, most state laws and court cases require that dimpled chad be counted as votes. It is obvious that the ballots should have been hand-counted in every county where a significant number of ballots were rejected by the counting equipment.
They should certainly be counted in the four counties that have recounts underway due to the number of rejected ballots compared to the margin by which Bush is ahead. There are probably other counties where a hand-count should have taken place. I'm not an attorney so I don't have an opinion on whether the Bush Campaign should be allowed to go back and ask for those recounts.
One thing is for sure: a coin toss with a 50 percent probability of winning is more likely to provide an accurate result then a 0.016 percent lead resulting from a machine count.
Geoff Staples is an election judge from Dallas, Texas.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US