The definition of free speech is as Lucia Yeh ("Annette Lu provokes very strong reactions,"Nov. 9, page 8) defines it. It provides us with the right to speak as we feel necessary. It allows us to voice our opinions and beliefs without fear of persecution. Unfortunately, what Yeh does not realize is that political figures, particularly those in positions as senior as Vice-President Annette Lu's (呂秀蓮), require a sense of responsibility.
What this means is that in a democracy, while we are given the right to speak as we choose, this does not include the right to slander people and accuse individuals of corruption and misdeeds (particularly when the accusations are not supported by evidence). Lu, as one of this nation's leaders, should embody the level of decorum, responsibility and respect that we would be proud to see in our leaders.
The response of the high school students and their parents, is a reasonable one. In other major democratic states, parents are given a say in who and what is taught to their children. They should have been involved in the decision to have Lu speak at the school.
Free speech, when taken too literally leads to chaos. When this power is held in the hands of someone as powerful and influential as Lu (who we have to admit has sometimes been a little too outspoken for her own good), this is even more dangerous. Free speech is not just a right, it is a responsibility that we must all uphold, or risk devaluing it.
Winnie King
Taipei
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95