The opposition parties are now planning to recall President Chen Shui-bian
Careful examination of the law, however, reveals that it is extremely difficult for the opposition parties to recall Chen at this moment since the case is tangled with complicated political issues. If the opposition parties do not think before they act, they will only embarrass themselves.
First of all, according to Article 69 of the Public Officials Election and Recall Law
Thus, in accordance with that law, Chen shall not be recalled within a year of his inauguration on May 20. Since the law is "non-retrospection" (
Think about it. Even regular public officials' rights are protected by law. How can the president's and the vice president's rights not to be so protected?
I believe, therefore, that even if the legislators did pass a motion to recall the president in the Legislative Yuan, it is questionable whether the Central Election Commission (中央選舉委員會) would accept such a case. If Chen and his party members were to request a Council of Grand Justices' (大法官會議) interpretation of the recall's legitimacy, moreover, I don't believe the opposition parties would have a case.
Second, the president and the vice president are the heads of state. Their posts require stability so that they can serve the people without distraction. In fact, the presidents and vice presidents of many countries are endowed with rights of immunity (
Taiwan's opposition legislators, however, have chosen to recall Chen only for some abstract or ambiguous reasons, with subjective judgements toward Chen's personality and his performance as well. As a result, of course, it is unfair to recall the president, who was directly elected by the people of Taiwan, only for some vague reason.
From a political perspective, although the KMT and the PFP are working closely together to push for Chen's recall in order to overturn the DPP government. Each of these two parties has its own axe to grind.
If the KMT chose to impeach the premier, it might lose many of its current seats and become a minority party in the legislature after the next year's election while the PFP greatly expandsits seats. That's why the KMT has given up the impeachment and has chosen to work with the PFP to push for a recall. In the event that Chen really did step down, however, I believe KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) would lose the presidential election that would follow, leaving PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) the only one to benefit. No wonder Soong was so eager recently to make peace with Lien.
According to Additional Article 3 of the Constitution, the premier shall be appointed by the president without the consent of the legislature. Since the president is directly elected by the voters of Taiwan and needs to be responsible for all the people and Premier Chang Chun-hsiung
To be more specific, if the opposition legislators chose to recall Chen to show their distrust of him, they would also be showing their distrust of the premier, which certainly must lead to an impeachment of the premier and a legislative election.
In such a situation, the president can therefore dissolve the legislature under the Additional Article 2 of the Constitution, forcing the opposition legislators to request an interpretation by the grand justices as to whether distrust of the president equals distrust of the premier.
The interpretation which the legislator's would wish for, however, that distrust of the president does not equal distrust of the premier, would not materialize, since it would make no sense. As a result, the KMT would suffer badly if the president actually chose to dissolve the legislature.
Some so-called senior constitutional experts in Taiwan have stressed that the president can be recalled if the majority in the legislature wishes it. Is this really true? Perhaps they should take advice from our young constitutional experts.
Lee Hong-hsi is a law professor at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95