Outsiders have held out few prospects for a long-lived Chen Shui-bian
Since he underwent surgery for a chest tumor in April, Tang's recovery has been less than ideal. It took drugs and considerable endurance for him to handle the many affairs of the state. Tang had been dedicated to and serious about his job, but there are many factors beyond the control of the Executive Yuan.
The stock market has fallen from 9,000 to below 6,000. Traditional share prices have fallen so low that they are now being called "dumpling" or "egg" shares -- the price of each share being approximately the same as those items. Rumors abound in the business circles about a domestic financial crisis.
Also, government efficiency has not improved as much as expected. The Pachang Creek
The Chen-Tang administration had tried to use "government for all the people" as a slogan to break the shackles of party politics -- but this only resulted in endless conflicts with the KMT and the PFP. Tang kept his distance from the DPP, thereby ensuring that relations between the Cabinet and the DPP remained tense. DPP secretary-general Wu Nai-jen
Tang and Chen have maintained their mutual respect for each other. Chen has publicly praised Tang for his performance and thanked him for jumping into the line of fire for the new government. However, the two differed fundamentally -- in their backgrounds and ideologies -- differences that are difficult to smooth over. Also, the semi-presidential design of Taiwan's Constitution did not help the interaction between them. The premier was often caught in an awkward position between the president and his Cabinet members, making it difficult for the Chen-Tang administration to carry on.
And Tang wasn't particularly keen about holding onto the premier's post. Since taking office, Tang had asked the president seven times to let him resign. The media had also criticized him, saying he did not take his job seriously and therefore couldn't possibly do a good job. Even though anyone can easily guess that the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant row was the immediate cause of his resignation, Tang magnanimously said that he was resigning for health reasons, saving Chen's government considerable face.
Tang may have resigned with a regret that he had not been able to do much for political and economic construction in the short four months he was in office. But he has certainly played an important stabilizing role in the peaceful transition of political power. Tang may have set a record for being Taiwan's shortest-serving premier, but he has also accomplished a mission in this transition. Tang stood firm on his personal ideas, but he also took care to save the president face.
Tang's comment on his four months in power was, "I've fought a good fight. I have no regrets." An admirable exit line for a general who accidentally became a politician.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US