Steven Crook ("Tourism equals political benefits,"August 21, 2000) ponders why tourists do not visit Taiwan as much as other countries. I agree that one does not see many tourism advertisements for Taiwan in newspapers here in America. This may be one reason.
The root of the problem is far deeper, however. The KMT promoted the fallacy that Taiwan is "Free China" so well in the last 50 years that the international traveler now thinks of Taiwan as China.
When he hears the words "Republic of China" he thinks of the "People's Republic of China." So travelers wishing to see the sites of China go to China. Why would they come to Taiwan to see the "false China?"
The subtleties of the erudite semantic exercises that we see today from major politicians about being "Chinese" from the Republic of China versus being "Chinese" from the People's Republic of China are lost on Westerners.
Frankly, in the Westerners' eyes, Chinese are Chinese, whether from the Republic of China or the People's Republic of China.
That is why it is crucial that Taiwan recognize itself as Taiwan, and that the Taiwanese recognize themselves as Taiwanese and not pretend to be something that they are not.
This is why China's cries to the world that other nations should stay out of its internal affairs have been so powerful when the issue of Taiwan is raised, because Taiwan still thinks of itself as China, albeit the Republic thereof. Quite confusing don't you think?
In the US, China is not highly regarded because of its human rights abuses, its alleged use of prison labor, its population control program and its anti-American views, as well its alleged contributions to the US presidential election in 1996.
For Taiwanese politicians to refer to Taiwan as "The Republic of China" during major speeches and interviews, therefore casts Taiwan in a negative light because, firstly, people don't realize that "Republic of China" refers to Taiwan and, secondly, the word "China" is perceived unfavorably here in America.
Taiwan has achieved a remarkable transformation from a society that suppressed human rights under martial law to an economically successful democracy. Why tarnish that image by associating it with "Republic of China" or with "China," terms which bring to mind, past and current atrocities?
Taiwan needs to promote Taiwan in the world as Taiwan, without the prefix "Republic of China." The term is an antiquated yoke of oppression, politically, culturally and socially.
Once the people of the world realize that Taiwan is Taiwan and not China, the world will better understand Taiwan and its separate history and culture. This is how Taiwan will benefit, politically and socially.
Promote Taiwan for what it is: Taiwan, the beautiful island.
Gene Deune, MD
Assistant Professor
Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers