Steven Crook ("Tourism equals political benefits,"August 21, 2000) ponders why tourists do not visit Taiwan as much as other countries. I agree that one does not see many tourism advertisements for Taiwan in newspapers here in America. This may be one reason.
The root of the problem is far deeper, however. The KMT promoted the fallacy that Taiwan is "Free China" so well in the last 50 years that the international traveler now thinks of Taiwan as China.
When he hears the words "Republic of China" he thinks of the "People's Republic of China." So travelers wishing to see the sites of China go to China. Why would they come to Taiwan to see the "false China?"
The subtleties of the erudite semantic exercises that we see today from major politicians about being "Chinese" from the Republic of China versus being "Chinese" from the People's Republic of China are lost on Westerners.
Frankly, in the Westerners' eyes, Chinese are Chinese, whether from the Republic of China or the People's Republic of China.
That is why it is crucial that Taiwan recognize itself as Taiwan, and that the Taiwanese recognize themselves as Taiwanese and not pretend to be something that they are not.
This is why China's cries to the world that other nations should stay out of its internal affairs have been so powerful when the issue of Taiwan is raised, because Taiwan still thinks of itself as China, albeit the Republic thereof. Quite confusing don't you think?
In the US, China is not highly regarded because of its human rights abuses, its alleged use of prison labor, its population control program and its anti-American views, as well its alleged contributions to the US presidential election in 1996.
For Taiwanese politicians to refer to Taiwan as "The Republic of China" during major speeches and interviews, therefore casts Taiwan in a negative light because, firstly, people don't realize that "Republic of China" refers to Taiwan and, secondly, the word "China" is perceived unfavorably here in America.
Taiwan has achieved a remarkable transformation from a society that suppressed human rights under martial law to an economically successful democracy. Why tarnish that image by associating it with "Republic of China" or with "China," terms which bring to mind, past and current atrocities?
Taiwan needs to promote Taiwan in the world as Taiwan, without the prefix "Republic of China." The term is an antiquated yoke of oppression, politically, culturally and socially.
Once the people of the world realize that Taiwan is Taiwan and not China, the world will better understand Taiwan and its separate history and culture. This is how Taiwan will benefit, politically and socially.
Promote Taiwan for what it is: Taiwan, the beautiful island.
Gene Deune, MD
Assistant Professor
Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US