On Aug. 8, DPP Secretary-General Wu Nai-jen
Wu is a senior member of the DPP's New Tide faction
The premier is the highest executive of the ROC; his power is next to the president's and the vice president's. Few, however, can really understand the difficulties of being premier.
Perhaps former premier Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) does. Tang and Siew are both talented and competent persons. Nevertheless, trapped in Taiwan's semi-presidential system they have found themselves stuck in the middle -- between a president who has supreme power and a cabinet whose members consider the president as their real boss. The premier, who has to face interrogation in the Legislative Yuan, is just like the president's punching bag, getting hit by everybody.
Tang's situation is worse than what Siew faced. Being from the minority party in the Legislative Yuan, President Chen Shui-bian
Even though Siew chaired several government ministries and was assigned by the KMT to run in a legislative election in order to familiarize himself with the political situation in the Legislative Yuan before he was actually appointed as the premier, he was criticized for being Lee Teng-hui's
Tang, however, was a military man. His professional experience and interpersonal connections are limited largely to the military. Without a sound business, management, justice, or political background and lacking capable and experienced officials to assist him, it's no surprise that the effectiveness and quality of the new government's policies is being questioned.
Moreover, Tang is plagued by bad luck. Before the new government was formed, he was hospitalized and underwent surgery. Next he faced tough challenges from the Legislative Yuan. Then the Pachang Creek tragedy (
Wu's criticism once again highlighted concerns for the position of premier. However, if our constitutional structure cannot be improved, anyone appointed premier will face similar difficulties. If the DPP and KMT intend to help Tang, possible adjustments to the semi-presidential system should be thoroughly discussed at the interparty round table meeting called by Chen.
If we can have a political system with a clear division of authority and responsibility, then either the presidential system
Vincent Lin is the assistant editor-in-chief of the Taipei Times.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers