While closely following the questioning of Premier Tang Fei (
The March election was a milestone in Taiwan's history, one that should have provided a turning point in the way that Taiwan is viewed abroad. It was a positive signal that the transition to democracy is complete. Yet Taiwan continues to allow itself to be represented by negative stereotypes that cast long shadows over its accomplishments.
Before Taiwan became democratized, an authoritarian government contradicted the image of "Free China." Democracy, however, has unleashed an approach to negative election campaigning that makes even the most hardened observer blush with embarrassment.
Now, as the world is watching to see how Taiwan copes with the first peaceful transition of government in Chinese history, the opposition parties in the Legislative Yuan choose to trivialize its proceedings and forgo the chance to show the international community that Taiwan knows how to manage an effective, responsible and policy-driven democracy.
The Telegraph and Argus is an evening newspaper produced six days a week in my hometown of Bradford, England. Being a local newspaper, its coverage of international news is confined to a couple of small paragraphs buried deep within its pages. Yet at regular intervals during the past decade the T&A, as it is affectionately known, has printed photographs of members of the Legislative Yuan physically attacking each other. This provides a source of amusement for readers.
I shamefully concede that the majority of my fellow Britons know only a handful of facts about Taiwan. First, it is somewhere near China. Second, that it was the main source of cheap plastic imports that flooded into the UK in the 1970s and early 1980s. Third, it is regularly subjected to threats of missile attack and invasion by Beijing; and fourth, its politicians hit each other.
The majority of the people at my hometown know nothing about the political miracle here, about the peaceful transition of government, about the vibrant democracy and dynamic economy being created. The 2000 election was headline news in the UK for one day only before the media lost interest and moved on to its next story. Coverage in 1996 was more intense, but only because the Chinese missile "tests" and the US response overshadowed the election.
How can Taiwan overcome the negative stereotypes that blight its international image? My research has focused on the work of Taiwan's representative offices throughout the world and has suggested several conclusions.
First, members of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Government Information Office stationed overseas must work much harder to engage in public relations abroad, with the emphasis on public, rather than political relations.
Second, it is imperative that they receive training in how to use and work with the media. That they do not do so already was the most surprising discovery of my research. Third, they need to avoid holding Taiwan's position within the international system responsible for all the problems they encounter and their limited successes.
Accepting the need to engage in propaganda, a neutral activity that should be devoid of moral judgement (since it is the intention of the propaganda that it important), would unleash the creativity that modern public relations and diplomacy require.
Finally, Taiwan's electorate needs to seize the initiative and demonstrate to the world community that it is capable of regulating the behavior of its elected representatives.
Take comfort from the fact that they will have to account for their actions at the next legislative election. That is democracy, and that is why it is critical for the electorate to have full access to the proceedings of the Legislature via television. Scrutiny of government actions and open accountability are the cornerstone of democracy.
Let the politicians who would make a mockery of the political process and reinforce the negative images of Taiwan know that you are watching them and judging their behavior. How much longer will you let Taiwan be a source of amusement for the international community?
Gary Rawnsley, a lecturer in politics at the University of Nottingham, UK, is a visiting scholar at the Graduate Institute of Political Science, National Sun Yat-sen University.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented