Comparing the inaugural ceremony for Taiwan's 10th president with similar ceremonies in the PRC is interesting. The ceremony in Taiwan was full of pomp and circumstance, both in the formal exchange of power and the speeches by President Chen Shui-bian
The Taipei celebration and Chen's speech both had a Taiwanese feel. Chen may have mentioned the ROC many times in his speech, but the ROC has been "localized." Chen also refer-red to Taiwan as "forever the mother" and called himself "Taiwan's son," remarks that could not have come from the KMT. Having the national anthem sung by Chang Hui-mei
Chen's address mentioned all the issues of concern to the public, including political, economic, community and environmental topics. His comments about a small government were surprising, since former opposition parties often abuse their newfound powers out of excitement. The DPP, which started out as a grassroots movement and has a socialist tinge to it, has long advocated the realization of social equality through administrative measures. A small government run by the DPP would reduce corruption.
But the pressure of recent Chinese threats meant the focus of attention was Chen's remarks about cross-strait policy.
Ahead of the inauguration, China's state media launched new attacks against Chen in a bid to influence his speech. On May 15, a People's Daily editorial stated that Chen could not avoid the "one China" principle and on the 17th, the Xinhua News Agency editorial claimed that the path of Lee Teng-hui
Just hours after Chen's speech, Beijing claimed he had avoided the "one China" principle and lacked both sincerity and good-will. Clearly Beijing was not satisfied with Chen's principled, yet "soft" approach, but it seemed to harbor hope for him. China's fiercest criticism was reserved for "some of those in power in Taiwan, who are guilty of being "resolutely in favor of independence for Taiwan." Who "they" are, no one knows.
This stubborn and unrealistic response will only continue to drive a wedge between China and Taiwan. There is no hope for the two countries merging. One must engulf the other. In his speech Chen may have said that the people across the Taiwan Strait share the same ancestral, cultural and historical background, but differences are mounting due to the prolonged separation. There are cultural commonalities between Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore and Macau, but there are also salient differences.
Taiwan has undoubtedly created an economic and political miracle and will continue to manufacture miracles. China,however, refuses to give up one-party rule, insists its government structure is the best in the world and refuses to reform. How could Taiwan unify with a country that retains such an outdated system of government? Unification with China would send the miracles Taiwan has achieved over the past five decades into the grave.
Paul Lin is a political commentator residing in the US.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers