Even in Taiwan's bloated bureaucracy, the Overseas Chinese Affairs Commission (OCAC) stands out as one of the most obviously wasteful units.
Someone has come up with an official figure of 33 million "overseas Chinese," which might imply that the OCAC's remit covers more than the rest of the central government combined. Fortunately, it is completely spurious. The figure includes the large populations of ethnic Chinese in Southeast Asia as well as the many "Chinatowns" in North America and elsewhere. These people are citizens of foreign countries, where they have lived for generations and they maintain, at most, only a sentimental attachment to China. In an astonishing addition, this definition of "old overseas Chinese"
In fact, the OCAC is simply another relic of the old Republic of China. Ever since Sun Yat-sen
Since its establishment shortly after the founding of the Republic, the OCAC's real mission has been to lobby ethnic Chinese people to support the KMT in its struggle against the communists. Thus, its activities overlap almost completely with those of the KMT's Overseas Affairs Bureau
In short, for reasons dating from the pre-modern era, Taiwan's government contains a Cabinet-level organization that propagandizes and tries to curry favor with foreigners who happen to be of Chinese descent but, for the most part, have no specific connection to Taiwan.
In a related constitutional travesty, overseas Chinese nominally have the right to vote in Taiwan, and even more obnoxious, they are allotted eight reserved seats in the legislature. At last count, some 50,000 of these people registered to vote, but they get as many seats as the Aboriginal peoples of Taiwan (both "lowland" and "highland"), who not only number some 200,000 persons, but also have a genuine need for special status and protection that reserved seats imply. The idea that these emigres deserve reserved seats is mind-boggling.
The incoming director of the OCAC, Chang Fu-mei
She has gotten off on the right foot by calling for the mandate of the OCAC to be restricted to only those actually holding ROC citizenship. China eliminated special legal treatment for overseas Chinese as far back as the 1960s, correctly calculating that failure to do would only poison its relations with Southeast Asian countries. Ending the pretense of claiming these people as "compatriots" would be a very useful way for Taiwan to show its good will to these important neighbors.
Even supposing that one was interested in helping or providing services to these people at all, all of the OCAC's functions could easily be performed by the foreign ministry. At most, one might think, additional staff might need to be posted to countries with significant ethnic Chinese populations. Taiwan is probably the only country in the world that maintains a separate Cabinet body for such task.
Chang is an individual of undeniable integrity. But the task before her is formidable. Even with the best intentions, it cannot be easy for a Cabinet member to preside over the destruction of her agency. But that is precisely what Chang needs to do.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US