In today's Taiwan, shallow and materialistic young girls in sexy and revealing clothes are turning to"enjokosai,"
One newspaper story said: "With the rapid rise of feminism, the culture of "hot girls"
Taiwan's mass media has a very vague, incomplete and unfamiliar understanding of "feminism."
Take Vice President-elect Annette Lu
Nevertheless, if women's autonomy and dignity are considered an essence of feminism, can we assume "hot girls" who trade their young bodies for money as a "school" of feminism?
The porn culture of "hot girls" is the result of the colonialization of Taiwan by Japanese pop culture.
Besides "enjokosai," Japanese porn culture has infiltrated Taiwan's media, Internet, video tapes, DVD, literature and leisure life. In the area of pornography alone, the explosive impact of Japanese porn culture is felt on both the economic and social levels.
Such a materialistic concept of porn consumption is deeply rooted and seriously affects our younger generation's mentality and values. It is widely believed by the public that sex is a daily activity beyond the restrictions of discipline and morality. "Hot girls" have drawn more attention simply because they are dressed in a sexually revealing way.
The "enjokosai" of "hot girls" has helped our society to move from the traditional institution of marriage (a kind of wholesale prostitution) into the retailing of sexual entertainment. It did not derive from a feminist awakening. It is a regression for the women's rights movement, since these girls materialize and belittle their bodies as commodities.
The prevailing porn culture of "hot girls" is based on an erroneous materialism. It actually has nothing to do with feminism.
The goal of feminism is to fight for completely equal rights between men and women. The movement has gone through hardship in Europe and the US for a century and finally made limited progress in Taiwan at the end of the 20th century.
Now, we need to clarify that women's autonomy is not autonomy to engage in prostitution. We do not want the public to be misled.
"Anti-porn" has always been an important topic of discussion in the history of feminism. While pioneer feminists still remember their glorious battles against porn culture, it will be very difficult for them to change their mind and endorse the porn culture.
I believe the economy of sex will become a tremendous industry in the 21st century. The foxy girls are just the first ripples in this wave. Anything related to human beings' sexual behavior will seriously affect marriage, family and social customs. The maturity of feminism will, to a certain degree, be related to it, and that is another issue worthy of discussions.
Victoria Lu is an associate professor of arts at the Shih Chieh University.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers