The construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant itself is a clear tradeoff between economic goals and environmental protection. The continued supply of cheap electricity demands more generation capacity, which will further damage Taiwan's already weakened ecosystems.
However, there are larger issues at stake. Indeed, the decision looks firmly set to be the first major crisis of Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) presidency, putting great strains on the incoming Cabinet before it even takes office. These were dramatically put on display yesterday, in the comments by DPP Chairman Lin I-hsiung (林義雄) and the KMT reactions.
Lin has come out strongly that the DPP party platform line must be followed by a DPP government. So far, so normal: what use is a platform, after all, if it is simply ignored when the party wins?
However, the question is, to what extent is the incoming government a DPP government? The phrase that has been bandied about to describe it is "DPP-led." But what exactly does that mean?
The KMT is arguing that the presence of 15 of its members in the new Cabinet gives the KMT a say in policymaking. The suggestion yesterday by the Central Standing Committee that the party might discipline any of these who violate "party principles" was, in context, a clear threat not to support cancelation of the nuclear project, which the KMT has pushed for years.
It was always unrealistic to suppose the so-called "people's government," or "cross-party government" would ever be anything other than a messy compromise. Now the nuclear issue is going to put the idea to the test from day one.
There has long been speculation about what Taiwan's hybrid, semi-presidential system means in practice. As long as the KMT retained power, such questions were only of academic interest. But now they are out in the open, and the way in which they are settled will have a direct impact, not only on real policies, but on the future of Taiwan's political order.
There are only two stable equilibrium points to which the system could evolve: a presidential model, where the government would be directed by the president, or a parliamentary model, where it would be directed by the majority party in parliament. In the former case, if the president's party does not command a majority in parliament, the government must engage in policy bargaining with the legislature, the success or failure of which then becomes an issue in the next election. In the latter case, if no party has a majority, one must be put together through a coalition agreement typically cemented by allocation of Cabinet seats.
What Chen has tried to do is to square this circle, by appointing Tang Fei (唐飛) as premier, and giving such a generous allotment of seats to non-DPP members. At first, it appeared that his strategy was working. Many hailed the choice of Tang as a masterstroke. Of course, Tang's appointment had other significance -- ensuring military loyalty and reassuring those worrywarts abroad who still believed Chen was going to declare independence on May 20.
It had been widely believed that the Cabinet would serve well enough until the next at least until the next legislative elections. At that time, adjustments could be made depending on whether the DPP's position is strengthened or not.
But now it seems that the domestic side of Chen's equation is in trouble. With Lin coming out clearly for a move toward the presidential pole, and the KMT starting to flex its muscles, the new Cabinet, for all its abilities, might be heading from an early meltdown. That might well be positive, moving Taiwan toward a healthier system of party politics. But it will certainly be messy.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US