A lot has been written about the end of diplomatic relations between the Vatican and the Republic of China. Nevertheless the Catholic Church in Taiwan has not issued any "official" word; neither has the Bishops Conference nor the Nunciature (the Vatican embassy).
To analyze the diplomatic relations between the two, we must first stress the differences in the way this relationship is viewed by the two sides.
From the Vatican's viewpoint, the aim is to keep the relationship very low profile. Since 1971, the Vatican's representative to the ROC has been at the lowest level possible, "Charge affaires ad interim" -- that is a "caretaker for the time being." Switching recognition would in fact simply be the breaking of the last razor-thin political thread connecting the Vatican and the ROC.
On the ROC's side, the diplomatic representation is high profile since it has too few allies to undervalue one, even if it as small as the Vatican. Since 1959 all the representatives have been at the ambassador level and the First Lady visited the Pope not too long ago.
In the past the ROC government considered itself the true government of the Chinese people (on both sides of the strait). The Catholic Church in the ROC (a great number of bishops, clergy, religious and lay people fled with Chiang Kai-shek to Taiwan in 1949) also considered itself the true representative of China's Catholics (on both sides of the Taiwan Strait). It was not until 1999 that the Bishops Conference changed its name from the "Chinese Regional Bishops" Conference to something like "Taiwan Area Bishops" Conference.
As in the Gospels, we can say that the end of diplomatic relations between the ROC and the Vatican is something known only by the Father and those he wants to reveal it to.
Some very prestigious people say the break is far from imminent. Others say that it has already been signed and that the last trip to the Vatican by former Foreign Minister Jason Hu was to request a delay in announcing the switch so that the change would not have an impact on the March presidential election.
Either way it looks like we will know something after the election. And there are facts to support each view.
The recent ordination of Catholic bishops in China without the Vatican's approval would appear to reinforce the first view. However, some Catholic priests, nuns and lay people who have visited China from Taiwan say the Catholic Church in China is preparing, perhaps even has already prepared, for a switch of diplomatic relations at any moment. They say the Beijing government is trying to bridge the gulf between the underground and the official Catholic Church as much as possible.
What would a diplomatic switch mean for Catholics in Taiwan?
Politically, less than nothing. Spiritually, just remember the Church says of itself that it is both Holy and Sinner -- maybe this "Vatican Statehood" is the consequence of the sinful part of the Church.
Ethically at least one question remains -- how can the Catholic Church switch relations from a democratic government (chosen by and so representative of its people) and a dictatorship (a government not representative of its people)?
What would it mean in practice? My hope is that in practice it will mean everything. Like Father Jac Kuepers said in One Spirit magazine when summarizing the "China-Vatican, Taiwan-Vatican Relations Seminar": Catholics in Taiwan have to identify with Taiwan's society and so find their own identity; the Church in Taiwan is not just part of the Church in China, not just part of the Universal Church, its identity is first of all to be found in Taiwan society.
Kuepers said the local Taiwan Catholic Church has to represent the aspirations, sufferings and ideals of the people of Taiwan before God and also in the Catholic communion of churches with the Bishop of Rome as first among equals.
Taiwan is a society in search of its identity: the Church's task is to accompany and support this search with the light of the Gospel.
Although it has not been advertised in Taiwan, there was a letter sent from a Catholic representative group in Taiwan to the Vatican, trying to press the Pope not to break relations with Taiwan when establishing them with China. The letter caused quite a big disturbance.
Is it just, right, or fair to send Taiwanese Catholics to the land of oblivion for the sake of putting Chinese Catholics under the Vatican's wings?
Only time can tell what will happen and when it will happen. Until then, we should not worry. Maybe the greatest opportunity for the Catholic Church in Taiwan is to find its true identity is waiting around the corner in the form of a switch of diplomatic relations. Let's switch it on!.
Francisco Carin Garcia is a Claretian missionary living in Taipei County.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US