The seriousness of business-politician conspiracies is not the only thing to come to light with the recent row over legislators pressuring banks to invest in certain venture capital companies. The incident also shows the unwholesome side-effects of undue government intervention in economic activities.
For this kind of pressure to succeed, there has to be at least two factors closely related to inappropriate government intervention in economic activities. One is the government's management style over state-owned banks, or banks where the government holds a large portion of shares. The other factor is the intervention of government authorities in bank operations.
For historical reasons, Taiwan has a large number of state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Even though Taiwan has been following the global privatization trend, there are still a large number of SOEs and the government remains the biggest shareholder in several companies that are nominally privatized.
The government has yet to establish a reasonable system to manage these businesses. As a result, many enterprises seem to be private and therefore not subject to government intervention and the supervision of elected officials. In reality, these companies still have to follow the orders of government authorities and lawmakers.
It is quite possible that this situation can lead to even more political intervention and consequent irregularities than in the past, when the companies were plain SOEs and thus everything followed government rules.
Under the current circum-stances, government authorities hold important personnel appointment powers at these companies and so have influence over policymaking. This kind of influence is not defined by law. It is wielded and peddled in private. The influence also makes it easier for lawmakers to pressure these businesses indirectly through interpellations, budget reviews and the government authorities concerned.
Therefore, if the government cannot effect genuine privatization soon, then it should quickly set up regulations to free companies in which it has a controlling stake from political influences. The current "let's pretend privatization" approach no longer works.
Another key lies in the rule authorizing government agencies to review banks' investments. While the original purpose may have been to prevent banks from making bad investments, the rule could become an excuse for banks to shirk responsibility. In state-owned banks and banks in which government shares account for the majority of the stock, government authorities are the big boss. For projects conducted under pressure from -- and reviewed by -- the big boss, it is easy for those following orders to shirk their responsibilities. As a result, it is easier for them to succumb to pressure from government agencies or elected representatives.
Much remains to be debated over whether or not the government should intervene in economic activities. Many scholars believe that the government should intervene in situations where market mechanisms have failed and that the government should set up and maintain various systems to safeguard economic competition.
But most scholars do not support direct government intervention in business because it will lead to inefficiency and irregularities. The uproar over legislators pressuring banks is just the latest incentive for the government to speed up improvements in the privatization of SOEs and the liberalization of financial management.
Otherwise, not only will economic efficiency be low, but the political milieu -- nurtured by illegal interests -- will also become more corrupt.
Chen Po-chih is a professor of economics at National Taiwan University.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US