Vice President Lien Chan (
He could not have foreseen this result.
Meanwhile, some people are deliberately trying to stir up bad blood between Lien and President Lee Teng-hui (
As a result, he is faced with both external threats and internal turmoils.
Frankly speaking, if the situation continues, it is questionable whether Lien will ever have the courage again to express his own opinions.
Lien had hoped to play the role of an ideas man by proposing placing the KMT's assets into a trust.
He preferred to address the party's pitfalls rather than passively waiting for his opponents to launch attacks.
However, Lien aired the proposal without support or a timetable in place. As a result he left himself wide open to harsh criticism and was badly hurt as a result.
In the end he was trapped by a situation he created. Lien's luck could not possibly get worse.
In addition, when compared to other candidates, Lien simply lacks the talent for campaigning.
Other candidates are able to put on dramatic news conferences, while Lien sounds like a professor giving lectures.
Although what Lien lectures about may make a lot of sense, his listeners remain unmoved.
Anyone who has ever participated in an election knows that nothing moves voters more than those statements that not even the candidates themselves believe.
He can promise to build a bridge where there is not even a river. He can draw a beautiful portrait of the future to hang on the wall, so that you have something to hope for.
He can even solemnly say that he lives for the people of Taiwan.
These words may be no better than the sweet nothings lovers exchange, but the voters are mesmerized and take them for real.
Unfortunately, Lien lacks the ability to do the same and he does not have the genetic makeup for popular moves.
He does not sound humorous when he tells a joke.
He does not sound mean when he condemns others.
He sounds awkward when he tries to sell himself.
He is like a poker player who can screw up a great hand.
James Soong's (
But the proposal to place the KMT's party assets in a trust did not increase Lien's popularity.
As for Lien's concern that others are stirring up ill feeling between him and Lee, if Lien could communicate openly with Lee and reach a consensus that "that was then and this is now," what is there to fear?
Let's use the US as an example. Vice President Al Gore and President Bill Clinton have reached a silent consensus on four points: "I share all of your accomplishments; all of your faults have nothing to do with me; you endorse all the checks that I have issued; and I act for myself and you encourage me."
Gore's popularity has gradually improved from the slump he was in as a result of this tactic.
If Lien cannot reach a similar consensus with Lee,he must follow of all Lee's game rules and keep his mouth shut about his own opinions or he will find himself bogged down by rumors for the rest of the campaign.
If that happens, can he remain in the race?
Wang Chien-chuang is the president of The Journalist magazine.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers