Women's rights in Taiwan have again failed to achieve a passing grade, as a survey released by women's organizations on Jan. 7 indicates the budget set up for domestic violence and sexual abuse prevention centers this year is only NT$100 million -- or NT$4.8 for each Taiwanese woman.
The Domestic Violence Prevention Act (DVPA,
Over the past six months, the number of restraining orders issued under the DVPA has failed to keep up with the number of applications. As a result, the efficiency of the law has been bitterly criticized. More victims will apply for restraining orders if do-mestic violence prevention centers follow the new regulations and play an aggressive role in curbing violence.
Besides psychological counseling, the centers should help victims amass the evidence needed to obtain restraining orders. However, the centers are short of resources. We cannot help but ask how domestic violence prevention centers can assist victims when social workers do not even have time to answer phone calls.
The organizational regulations of the DVPA are mainly carried out by county and city governments. These governments should take domestic violence problems seriously by raising the status of domestic violence prevention centers and increasing the number of full-time social workers, not just providing a token group under the local social affairs department.
The Ministry of Interior's Domestic Violence Prevention Committee (
Only when these centers play a key role in dealing with problems of domestic violence and applications for restraining orders, can the law be implemented and can victims of domestic violence acquire basic protection.
Chou Ya-hsu is a DPP legislator.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers