One of the things that I like about the Taipei Times is that unlike the other English-language papers in Taiwan, you provide Chinese characters after proper names and certain phrases in your articles. While you are to be commended for doing this, at the same time it also highlights the miserable job that you are doing in Romanizing Chinese names.
As you know, there are two main Romanization systems -- Wade Giles and Pinyin. You appear to be using the Wade Giles system. However, every single day I can locate numerous mistakes.
To be fair, Romanization is a tough business in Taiwan. The people who are the most creative in it are the Taiwanese themselves. Particularly vexing are the creative Romanizations that become sanctified with their inclusion in the ROC Yearbook.
Nevertheless, just because you are afloat in a sea of incompetence does not mean that you have to go with the tide. At the very least I am sure your readers would appreciate it if you could be consistent.
One wonders, for instance, why yesterday's Yan Xuetong became today's Yen Xuetong.
Should I expect to have the buy the Taipay Tymes tomorrow?
Liam C. Kelley
Taipei
EDITOR'S NOTE:
While I agree that this newspaper's editing could be improved when it comes to the consistency of our Roman-ization of Chinese names, most of the cases you "find every single day" originate with other sources -- usually the person whose name is misspelled. For example, if Annette Lu wants to write her name without an umlaut, or Chen Hui-hsin(g) can't distinguish "hs" from "sh" ... we are still bound by their own spellings, since these are their "legal/passport" names. Besides, it is only respectful that we print their names the way that they have chosen to spell them. Name spelling is a very personal matter, as a glance at an American phone book, full of European names changed beyond recognition over the centuries, would tell you.
Anthony Lawrance
Managing Editor
License to complain
I wanted to get a Taiwan driver's license, really I did.
I had heard that if you had a valid license from the US you needed only to show up at the motor vehicle department, show it to them and they would smilingly make out one for Taiwan.
This turned out to be true to some extent. You can indeed get a local license if you happen to hold a US license from the state of Virginia, New Mexico or Missouri.
My North Dakota license, unfortunately, was not acceptable. Only those three states have "reciprocity," I was told.
What sort of reciprocity are we talking about here anyway? A driver's license from one US state is good in any other; the driving laws are standard. So what is it about these three states that make them so special?
I have never lived in any of these states and therefore have never held one of their driver's licenses. I can only assume that they must have some sort of special requirements, like taking the test in Chinese or showing a highly-developed sense of poor driving etiquette or some such thing.
Since swapping credentials was out of the question, I was told that I could take a written and driving test to get my Taiwan license. I asked if the test is in English. It is. There was only one problem: the study booklet is in Chinese.
Feeling like I was going to be the thousandth person to go through this, I asked if there was an English version. Oh sure, ...and the tooth fairy will bring it to you straight away.
So I started to wander away, no closer to being a legal driver than when I had come in, when the woman behind the counter motioned to me. Ah, I thought, this is where she tells me the shortcut to take that will make all this foolishness evaporate.
I figured there was some secret form to fill out and a window that only foreigners were directed to. If I acted sufficiently helpless I was bound to walk out of that office with a new license in my hand.
Her advice, however, was not quite the silver bullet I was hoping for: "You can fly back to America and get an international driver's license and then come back."
Oh, well.
Wolf Reinhold
Taipei
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers