A dispute over whether or not to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the end of the Second Sino-Japanese War is raging within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), former premier Hau Pei-tsun (郝柏村) and the Chinese-language United Daily News have joined forces in criticizing former vice president Lien Chan’s (連戰) visit to China to attend a military parade. However, the reasons they are using to denounce Lien contradict their previous attacks on former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) when he said Japan was his motherland.
This is a classic example of a party in decline. Tired, spent and fading, the KMT’s last resort is to commandeer history and in the process descend into sniping at each other.
The KMT has threatened to revoke Lee’s privileges as a former president, because as a former national leader he cannot call Japan his motherland in the same way an ordinary citizen can. The same argument was made by the United Daily News, which claimed Lien is a retired vice president and therefore cannot say he is visiting China in the capacity of an ordinary citizen.
So a former president cannot be an ordinary citizen. How is it, then, that a president can not only support other politicians’ election campaigns as an individual, he is actually commended for being able to separate his public and private spheres? This makes no sense.
Hau believes it was the KMT’s National Revolutionary Army (NRA) that fought against Japan, not the Eighth Route Army of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and definitely not the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Since only the NRA, which fought against Japan in World War II, can commemorate World War II, Taiwanese have less of a right to commemorate the victory than the PLA, which at least fought a guerrilla war with Japan. If the KMT thinks that the Eighth Route Army cannot take the credit for fighting against Japan, why does the KMT think that it is wrong for Lee to say Taiwanese did not fight against Japan in World War II, so Taiwanese should not commemorate it?
Furthermore, who among the nation’s current military personnel has fought against Japan? Who among the nation’s current government officials has fought against Japan? If the answer is no one, then who has the right to commemorate the victory? The KMT’s ultimate weapon is to claim that it is a historical fact that the Republic of China (ROC) government led the war against Japanese aggression from 1937 to 1945. Hence, whoever rules the ROC government should, in theory, have the right to commemorate the victory.
However, who did the ROC government lead? Chinese, of course. Who is leading Chinese now? The People’s Republic of China (PRC). So, if Chinese want to commemorate the war, and if the commemoration is not conducted by the PRC, then who should do it? The ROC?
There is only one reason for Taiwanese, who did not fight against Japan during the war and are currently ruled by the ROC, to commemorate the victory, and that is for the KMT to monopolize history. Or, more specifically, to let Hau and his dwindling posse monopolize the history of World War II.
This is all they have left. Their vote is collapsing in Taiwan, so they have to capitalize on the past and their own interpretation of the war to monopolize voters, and thereby maintain their hold on the ROC.
This was why they closed ranks against Lee. When that led nowhere, they turned their sights on Lien. They are angry at Lien for having the audacity to expose the truth that it was the Chinese who fought against Japan, and that the ROC government does not govern China.
Shih Chih-yu is a professor of political science at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
A 50-year-old on Wednesday last week died while under anesthesia at a Taipei cosmetic clinic shortly after undergoing a penis enlargement procedure. The surgeon was arrested for suspected medical malpractice, again bringing to the surface shortcomings in the regulation of cosmetic medicine. Media reports said the clinic owner and surgeon, surnamed Ting (丁), was previously convicted of negligent homicide for a postsurgical death and had been charged with coercion and aggravated assault after allegedly stopping a patient from calling for an ambulance. He had also been fined for failing inspections and had allegedly permitted people without medical licenses to assist
It was most annoying last week to read Chairman Xi Jinping’s (習近平) fulsome encomium to the People’s Liberation Army during the Eightieth Anniversary celebrations of victory over Japan in World War II. Comrade Xi’s soaring rhetoric was stuffed with “martyrs, sacrifice, solemnity and unwavering resolve” in praise of the “Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War.” His aspirations overflowed with “world peace” and love of the United Nations, of which China is a founding member. The Liberation Army Daily said that every word from General Secretary Xi Jinping “resounded in his powerful voice, illuminating the
An American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) spokesperson on Saturday rebuked a Chinese official for mischaracterizing World War II-era agreements as proving that Taiwan was ceded to China. The US Department of State later affirmed that the AIT remarks reflect Washington’s long-standing position: Taiwan’s political status remains undetermined and should only be resolved peacefully. The US would continue supporting Taiwan against military, economic, legal and diplomatic pressure from China, and opposes any unilateral attempt to alter the “status quo,” particularly through coercion or force, the United Daily News cited the department as saying. The remarks followed Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently sat down for an interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson in which he openly acknowledged that ChatGPT’s model behavior is indeed influencing the entire world, and that he himself is responsible for the decisions related to the bot’s moral framework. He said that he has not had a good night of sleep since its launch, as the technology could bring about unpredictable consequences. Although the discussion took place in the US, it is closely related to Taiwan. While Altman worries about the concentration of power, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has already weaponized artificial