North Korea may be a rogue state, part of the "axis of evil," an outpost of tyranny and all the other things that US President George W. Bush says it is. But there is no denying that the isolated regime of self-styled Dear Leader, Kim Jong-il, has an impeccable sense of timing.
Just before the 188-country conference charged with reviewing the 1970 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) gathered in New York this month, Pyongyang shut down its main nuclear reactor at Yongbyon. Since then it says it has removed 8,000 spent fuel rods and extracted sufficient plutonium to "bolster our nuclear arsenal."
Coming on top of North Korea's formal announcement in February that it had acquired nuclear weapons and its earlier withdrawal from the NPT, this latest shock seemed to confirm what every government knows but is reluctant to say in public.
A wide array of international safeguards, diplomatic pressure, economic sanctions, ill-disguised threats and a decade of on-off negotiations have failed to prevent egregious, highly dangerous acts of proliferation by one of the world's most unstable failed states.
Any remaining uncertainty over whether North Korea really has the bomb could be banished soon. According to US intelligence, Pyongyang may be about to conduct an underground nuclear test. As with the Indian and Pakistani tests in 1998, such an event would radically and permanently alter geostrategic and military calculations. For East Asia, it would be a whole new ball game.
The bad news for the NPT conferees in New York did not stop there. Even as they argued over an agenda, Iran was threatening to walk away from talks with the EU over its nuclear programs and ditch the treaty.
"If Iran cannot use its legitimate rights in the framework of the NPT, it will no longer have respect for the treaty," Iran's chief negotiator, Hassan Rohani, said in Moscow. In other words, if the EU, backed by the US, continued to insist on a permanent freeze of all Iran's uranium enrichment activities -- which Tehran says are for purely peaceful, civil purposes -- then Iran, like North Korea, would go its own way.
Iran's sense of timing also takes a lot of beating. Tehran is well aware that a major bone of contention at the NPT conference is the demand by non-nuclear weapons states that the five declared nuclear powers -- the US, Britain, France, Russia and China -- honor their own disarmament obligations.
Under the "13 Steps" agreed at the last NPT review meeting in 2000, the so-called "big five" agreed to make "further efforts to reduce their nuclear arsenals unilaterally." They also pledged "a diminishing role for nuclear weapons in security policies ... and to facilitate the process of their total elimination."
Iran and other countries point out, with justice, that these obligations have been largely ignored. The US is modernizing its nuclear arsenal, not moving to scrap it. It is also conducting research into new battlefield nuclear devices.
France holds proudly to its "force de frappe," a symbol of its otherwise shrinking national potency. The UK meanwhile is examining replacements for its submarine-based Trident nuclear weapons system and may buy "off the shelf" from the US in breach of NPT rules.
Concurrently, President Vladimir Putin is boasting of new world-beating Russian long-range missiles, with China showing even less interest in disarmament.
Meanwhile, the NPT's Article IV does in fact stress that signatory nations have the "inalienable right to develop ... nuclear energy for peaceful purposes" and to acquire technology to this end.
That, says Iran, is exactly what it is doing, and US distrust of its intentions is no good reason to desist.
All in all, the uncomfortable bottom line is that, far from being reinforced as was promised in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, international non-proliferation efforts are in deep trouble.
India, Israel and Pakistan, which never joined the NPT, have effectively got away with their bomb-making. Now, if North Korea is proved to have nuclear capability and if Iran, despite its denials, follows suit, countries ranging from Japan and South Korea to Egypt and Saudi Arabia may feel obliged to follow suit.
In other words, the successes of the NPT, for all its considerable faults, may be overwhelmed by a new nuclear arms race.
All the more reason, therefore, to heed the word of the former US president, Jimmy Carter. As a matter of urgency, he said this month, all nuclear-armed states should renounce first use of their weapons.
The US should abandon its "Star Wars" ballistic missile defense project and ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. Russia should do more to secure and reduce its vulnerable stockpiles. And Middle Eastern countries should act together to remove nuclear weapons from their region.
"If the US and other nuclear powers are serious about stopping the erosion of the NPT, they must act now on these issues," Carter warned. The relative indifference of the major powers to the gathering threat, he said, was little short of appalling.
Carter's timing was impeccable, too.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS