President Chen Shui-bian's (
Since 1949, a series of dramatic transformations in world politics have generated both opportunities and challenges for Taipei. During the early months of 1950, it appeared that Taiwan would be overrun by the People's Republic of China (PRC). The US refused to assist the island in its efforts to repel Communist aggression. After the outbreak of the Korean conflict on June 25, 1950, however, the Truman administration reversed its position. Washington and Taipei signed a defense treaty in 1954 and massive amounts of US economic and military aid poured into Taiwan.
During the late 1960s, strategic considerations led US president Richard Nixon to seek a rapprochement with China and in 1971 the US quietly acquiesced to Taiwan's expulsion from the UN. In 1979, Washington cut its ties with Taipei to establish diplomatic relations with Beijing. These moves came as a devastating blow to Taiwan, but there was nothing that the Taiwanese government could do about it.
The end of the Cold War helped Taiwan strengthen its ties with the US. American arms sales escalated and Washington upgraded its "unofficial" relations with Taipei. At the same time, relations with Beijing deteriorated. China ultimately came to be viewed as a "strategic competitor" of the US.
The 9/11 attacks led to a dramatic shift in the US foreign policy paradigm. US military strategy shifted from the deterrence that characterized the Cold War and toward pre-emptive action against terrorists. The new paradigm has moved China off Washington's "enemies list." Gone are the descriptions of China as a "strategic competitor." US President George W. Bush now praises the PRC as "the most important country" in the region.
The war against terrorism (and the North Korean nuclear crisis) has helped push Washington closer to Beijing. This helps explain why some Bush administration officials have criticized Taiwan. In fact, the link between the war on terrorism and strains in US-Taiwan relations was made clear when former US Secretary of State Colin Powell praised the "the positive role" that China has played in the war on terror while expressing his opposition to Taiwan's independence during a press conference last October.
To be sure, US-Taiwan relations have experienced some bumps in recent years. But many of these problems must be traced to structural shifts in global politics that are beyond Taipei's control. And in fact, US economic, military and political ties with Taiwan remain robust.
The US is no longer Taiwan's largest export outlet, but America remains Taiwan's second largest market, and bilateral economic ties have grown closer as a result of joint-venture partnerships and technology transfers. Moreover, despite PRC pressures, the US has no plans to reduce its arms sales or security commitments to Taiwan and it steadfastly opposes schemes hatched by some greedy European governments to sell arms to China. Furthermore, US support for Taiwan's participation in global institutions -- especially the World Health Organization -- continues to increase.
Maintaining strong ties with Washington is only one of the many challenges that Taipei will confront during Chen's second administration. But these challenges should not be exaggerated. Nor should they be attributed solely to one politician or camp.
Working together, the Taiwanese people will overcome the challenges that lie ahead.
Dennis Hickey is professor of political science at Missouri State University.
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
Birth, aging, illness and death are inevitable parts of the human experience. Yet, living well does not necessarily mean dying well. For those who have a chronic illness or cancer, or are bedridden due to significant injuries or disabilities, the remainder of life can be a torment for themselves and a hardship for their caregivers. Even if they wish to end their life with dignity, they are not allowed to do so. Bih Liu-ing (畢柳鶯), former superintendent of Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, introduced the practice of Voluntary Stopping of Eating and Drinking as an alternative to assisted dying, which remains
President William Lai (賴清德) has rightly identified the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as a hostile force; and yet, Taiwan’s response to domestic figures amplifying CCP propaganda remains largely insufficient. The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) recently confirmed that more than 20 Taiwanese entertainers, including high-profile figures such as Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜), are under investigation for reposting comments and images supporting People’s Liberation Army (PLA) drills and parroting Beijing’s unification messaging. If found in contravention of the law, they may be fined between NT$100,000 and NT$500,000. That is not a deterrent. It is a symbolic tax on betrayal — perhaps even a way for
RSS