From Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan's (
However, from an international perspective, such doubts seem unrelated to recent cross-strait developments. There is a tendency to not only ignore favorable international developments, but also to exaggerate the influence some politicians have on international relations. More importantly, Taiwan's commitment to democracy and the results of its efforts are often ignored. In fact, recent events prove that greater democracy is the only path to secure the nation's independent sovereignty.
China's "Anti-Secession" Law has increased the tension between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, as well as the international pressure on China. Through US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Washington repeatedly stressed that its policy of maintaining the status quo in the Strait has remained unchanged, to remind Beijing not to cross the line while reaffirming the necessary US role in cross-strait relations. The EU also halted moves to lift its arms embargo on China at the last moment. With the German parliament's rejection of lifting the ban, Beijing's incessant lobbying of the EU failed in the face of its threat to cross-strait peace.
Meanwhile Japan is attempting to extend its international influence, and has actively lobbied the international community on its bid to become a permanent member of the UN Security Council and to amend Article 9 of its Constitution to build up its military. This has worsened relations between China and Japan.
The current international atmosphere and the growing visibility of cross-strait issues allow Taiwan greater leverage on the international stage and more room to maneuver.
With political pressure mounting on Beijing in Taiwan's favor, China has decided to employ "soft power" tactics in a bid to reap the greatest benefit at the least cost to themselves, by holding talks with Lien and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (
Lien's and Soong's trips cannot be considered political victories for the KMT and PFP, as their actions have pushed their parties further toward extremism and is reducing their stature. Local support for the KMT and PFP is being reduced to a narrow band of extreme opinion, leaving more moderate voters out in the cold. The KMT and PFP are tending more and more to favor speedy unification, further narrowing their support base.
Given Taiwan's de facto independence, the Beijing authorities know more clearly than anyone that they should be talking with Taiwan's ruling party, the DPP. Its meetings with opposition leaders are hardly likely to result in any changes to Taiwan's sovereignty. Inviting KMT or PFP members to visit is just part of a show, and has nothing to do with cross-strait negotiations. At most, it will just confuse public opinion.
As far as Taiwan as a whole is concerned, there are two crucial points to consider: First, how is Taiwan to strengthen its democracy? If Taiwanese society and DPP supporters are thrown off balance by Beijing's showmanship to deny the democracy that we have been seeking over the past half a century, then Beijing will be handed an unexpected victory.
Party heads should show their leadership, displaying the real spirit of democracy to the people, rather than being caught up in self-destructive ideological confrontation. Otherwise we risk retarding the development of our democracy.
Second, can Taiwan use its advantages in the international community to break through the deadlock of cross-strait talks while maintaining dignity and equality? We can take advantage of the US and Japan's recent joint announcement urging a solution to the Taiwan question through peaceful negotiations, and demand the opening up of formal peace talks across the Strait.
It might even be appropriate to ask the US and Japan to mediate in such talks, or even to ask other international non-governmental organizations (especially human rights or peace organizations) to play an observing or supervisory role during the negotiations.
During last year's presidential elections, Taiwan was on the receiving end of international pressure about the question of the legality of holding the referendums simultaneously with the elections. Now, with the drive to amend the Constitution, this is to become a fundamental right of the people, guaranteed by the law.
These changes all go to show that democracy and its procedures are the greatest guarantees we have of assuring our sovereignty and independence. While Beijing is trying to distort political realities with the introduction of the Anti-Secession Law, Taiwan should be putting current political realities into law, legally ensconcing democracy, strengthening the democratic process within the country and providing a visible legal basis for it.
Any advantage we might have in a future confrontation with China will be in terms of democracy and human rights, and not in terms of military clout.
Chen Chi-mai is the acting mayor of Kaohsiung.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG AND PAUL COOPER
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS