From Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan's (
However, from an international perspective, such doubts seem unrelated to recent cross-strait developments. There is a tendency to not only ignore favorable international developments, but also to exaggerate the influence some politicians have on international relations. More importantly, Taiwan's commitment to democracy and the results of its efforts are often ignored. In fact, recent events prove that greater democracy is the only path to secure the nation's independent sovereignty.
China's "Anti-Secession" Law has increased the tension between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, as well as the international pressure on China. Through US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Washington repeatedly stressed that its policy of maintaining the status quo in the Strait has remained unchanged, to remind Beijing not to cross the line while reaffirming the necessary US role in cross-strait relations. The EU also halted moves to lift its arms embargo on China at the last moment. With the German parliament's rejection of lifting the ban, Beijing's incessant lobbying of the EU failed in the face of its threat to cross-strait peace.
Meanwhile Japan is attempting to extend its international influence, and has actively lobbied the international community on its bid to become a permanent member of the UN Security Council and to amend Article 9 of its Constitution to build up its military. This has worsened relations between China and Japan.
The current international atmosphere and the growing visibility of cross-strait issues allow Taiwan greater leverage on the international stage and more room to maneuver.
With political pressure mounting on Beijing in Taiwan's favor, China has decided to employ "soft power" tactics in a bid to reap the greatest benefit at the least cost to themselves, by holding talks with Lien and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (
Lien's and Soong's trips cannot be considered political victories for the KMT and PFP, as their actions have pushed their parties further toward extremism and is reducing their stature. Local support for the KMT and PFP is being reduced to a narrow band of extreme opinion, leaving more moderate voters out in the cold. The KMT and PFP are tending more and more to favor speedy unification, further narrowing their support base.
Given Taiwan's de facto independence, the Beijing authorities know more clearly than anyone that they should be talking with Taiwan's ruling party, the DPP. Its meetings with opposition leaders are hardly likely to result in any changes to Taiwan's sovereignty. Inviting KMT or PFP members to visit is just part of a show, and has nothing to do with cross-strait negotiations. At most, it will just confuse public opinion.
As far as Taiwan as a whole is concerned, there are two crucial points to consider: First, how is Taiwan to strengthen its democracy? If Taiwanese society and DPP supporters are thrown off balance by Beijing's showmanship to deny the democracy that we have been seeking over the past half a century, then Beijing will be handed an unexpected victory.
Party heads should show their leadership, displaying the real spirit of democracy to the people, rather than being caught up in self-destructive ideological confrontation. Otherwise we risk retarding the development of our democracy.
Second, can Taiwan use its advantages in the international community to break through the deadlock of cross-strait talks while maintaining dignity and equality? We can take advantage of the US and Japan's recent joint announcement urging a solution to the Taiwan question through peaceful negotiations, and demand the opening up of formal peace talks across the Strait.
It might even be appropriate to ask the US and Japan to mediate in such talks, or even to ask other international non-governmental organizations (especially human rights or peace organizations) to play an observing or supervisory role during the negotiations.
During last year's presidential elections, Taiwan was on the receiving end of international pressure about the question of the legality of holding the referendums simultaneously with the elections. Now, with the drive to amend the Constitution, this is to become a fundamental right of the people, guaranteed by the law.
These changes all go to show that democracy and its procedures are the greatest guarantees we have of assuring our sovereignty and independence. While Beijing is trying to distort political realities with the introduction of the Anti-Secession Law, Taiwan should be putting current political realities into law, legally ensconcing democracy, strengthening the democratic process within the country and providing a visible legal basis for it.
Any advantage we might have in a future confrontation with China will be in terms of democracy and human rights, and not in terms of military clout.
Chen Chi-mai is the acting mayor of Kaohsiung.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG AND PAUL COOPER
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
Birth, aging, illness and death are inevitable parts of the human experience. Yet, living well does not necessarily mean dying well. For those who have a chronic illness or cancer, or are bedridden due to significant injuries or disabilities, the remainder of life can be a torment for themselves and a hardship for their caregivers. Even if they wish to end their life with dignity, they are not allowed to do so. Bih Liu-ing (畢柳鶯), former superintendent of Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, introduced the practice of Voluntary Stopping of Eating and Drinking as an alternative to assisted dying, which remains
President William Lai (賴清德) has rightly identified the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as a hostile force; and yet, Taiwan’s response to domestic figures amplifying CCP propaganda remains largely insufficient. The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) recently confirmed that more than 20 Taiwanese entertainers, including high-profile figures such as Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜), are under investigation for reposting comments and images supporting People’s Liberation Army (PLA) drills and parroting Beijing’s unification messaging. If found in contravention of the law, they may be fined between NT$100,000 and NT$500,000. That is not a deterrent. It is a symbolic tax on betrayal — perhaps even a way for
RSS