The issue of Japan's apology for invading China from 1931 to 1945 and occupying Korea from 1910 to 1945 just won't go away, for two reasons:
-- The Chinese, South Koreans and North Koreans don't want the issue resolved because it has been a useful weapon to hammer Japan for political and economic concessions and divert attention from domestic troubles such as unemployment, corruption or repression.
-- The Japanese, despite repeated apologies over the years, have been singularly inept in putting the dispute to rest, with muted and often grudging expressions of remorse, failing to take credit for economic aid to Asians, and a general lack of forceful communication.
One way to cleanse this festering sore before it erupts into conflict would be to have Emperor Akihito of Japan intervene with a carefully crafted, definitive, and final apology. The Japanese government would reinforce that by compiling and publishing a record of apologies and establishing a "truth commission" to respond to allegations of wrongdoing.
For their part, the Chinese, South Koreans and North Koreans would demonstrate their willingness to bring this sorry quarrel to an end by agreeing beforehand to accept Japanese contrition and to consider the discord settled once and for all.
US academic Jane Yamazaki, of Wayne State University in Michigan, has written a book on this question. Yamazaki argues: "If one apologizes to someone who does not want to accept the apology, you can apologize over and over to no avail. For an apology to succeed, the recipient [and audience] must be willing to accept the apology." She concludes: "It is not a one-way exercise."
Ian Buruma, a prolific author on Asia, asks whether China would close the question if Japan met all of Beijing's demands. "Probably not," he says in Britain's Financial Times. "These outbursts of emotional and sometimes violent nationalism in China take place partly because they are the only expression of public protest the government allows."
In the latest exchange, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi of Japan told Asian and African leaders in Indonesia that Japan has engraved in its mind "feelings of deep remorse and heartfelt apology" and has adopted the "principle of resolving all matters by peaceful means."
The prime minister then met with Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), who did not accept the apology. Instead, Hu told Koizumi, "I would like you to recognize history correctly and I would like you to translate your remorse into actual action."
Among other things, he asserted that Japan should recognize China's claim to Taiwan, the country Japan ruled from 1895 to 1945. Likewise, President Roh Moo-hyun of South Korea has underscored Korean ambivalence toward Japan's apologies. In a speech, Roh first praised prime minister Tomiichi Murayama for apologizing in 1995 and prime minister Keizo Obuchi for joining a new partnership with Korea in 1998.
Roh noted that he and Koizumi had called for an "Age of Peace and Prosperity in Northeast Asia" in 2003 and proclaimed "I would not make a diplomatic issue" of historic problems. Then he reversed himself, asserting that Japanese "need to find out the truth about their past, reflect on it, and make a genuine apology as well as reparations if need be."
A fair share of the blame for this impasse must fall to Japanese who have been unwilling to point to their constructive efforts to atone for their misdeeds.
"It has been a reality for more than 30 years," says Michael Berger, a US consultant in Tokyo, "but it is largely unknown or unacknowledged."
Berger pointed to "all the investments, technology transfers, human support in engineers and technicians and other Japan-funded and managed projects that have profoundly improved the lives of local people across Asia."
Emperor Akihito could deliver the ultimate apology on Aug. 15 when Japan holds its memorial service to mark the end of World War II. Only the emperor has the standing as the symbol of the nation and head of state to speak for all of Japan..
Many Japanese contend that the emperor should be above politics. A precedent was set, however, in 1945 when the emperor's father, Emperor Hirohito, ordered a divided government to end the war.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
RSS