The recent surge in violent anti-Japanese protests in China has sent a shiver of alarm across East Asia -- and not least in Taiwan, the country with most to lose if rising Chinese nationalist sentiment translates into future military aggression.
Many of the causes of Sino-Japanese tensions are specific to those two countries. New school textbooks that glossed over wartime Japanese atrocities in China sparked the latest furore. The row coincided with a nationwide, government-sponsored campaign to block Japan's bid for a UN Security Council seat.
Relations between Tokyo and Beijing have been deteriorating since Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi came to power in 2001 and started annual visits to the Yasukuni Shrine, where Japan's 2.5 million war dead are commemorated along with several convicted war criminals.
Chinese officials say these visits, and the offending textbooks, prove that Japan is unrepentant about its militaristic past.
But while old wounds still fester, both sides may fairly be said to have mishandled a modern-day relationship that is important to both. Although not formally termed reparations, Japan has given significant economic aid to China since 1972 when diplomatic relations were restored. Annual trade is now worth about US$178 billion.
Japan's trade with China grew by 27 percent last year.
But while Japan may have neglected non-economic aspects of the relationship, China appears to have underestimated the impact of a new assertiveness in Japanese foreign policy evident under Koizumi. Japan is gradually loosening the straitjacket of its post-war pacifist constitution. For example, it sent troops to Iraq, albeit in non-combat roles.
And to China's dismay, it recently declared maintenance of peace in the Taiwan Strait to be a joint strategic objective with the US.
It is at this point in the story that Sino-Japanese strains take on a wider, regional significance. Japan is far from being the only country in East Asia concerned at China's rapid military build-up. It is not the only neighbor with unresolved territorial or maritime disputes with Beijing. Nor is Japan alone in carrying the burden of a shared history of enmity and bloodshed.
Despite last week's bridge-building visit to New Delhi by Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao (
And the possibly domineering role that China may assume in the mooted East Asia Community is of serious concern to the 10 members of the ASEAN as they prepare for this December's groundbreaking East Asian Summit in Kuala Lumpur.
But it is in Taiwan, which Beijing regards as a renegade province, that the surge in mainland Chinese nationalist feeling and externally-projected hostility is seen as most immediately threatening. It follows a steady military build-up across the Taiwan Strait. And it comes hard on the heels of China's so-called "Anti-Secession" Law that threatens non-peaceful means to unify Taiwan with the mainland.
"While the target may be Japan this time around, in the future such feverish nationalism may have serious implications for Taiwan," the Taipei Times said in a weekend editorial. "Once Chinese aggression begins, the prime target will be either Japan or Taiwan.
"But Taiwan has more reason to worry ... We should all be alarmed," the editorial said.
Speaking in a recent interview, Deputy Minister of National Defense Michael Tsai (
"We expect that total [of 700 missiles] to increase to 800 by 2006, including about 100 long-range missiles capable of delivering a warhead more than 12,000km -- capable of hitting California or any part of the Pacific region, including Korea and Japan," Tsai said.
Taiwanese can take some small comfort from the fact that China appears to have miscalculated the international impact of its Anti-Secession Law. The law is the principal reason why the EU has decided to delay, until next year at least, its plan to lift its post-Tiananmen arms embargo.
It has also helped refocus the Bush administration's attention on Taiwan and other China-related issues, disturbing its long-running fixation on Iraq and Middle Eastern terrorism. US President George W. Bush made a point last week of drawing attention to human-rights failings and restrictions on religious observance in China. "We expect there to be peace in Taiwan,"Bush said.
The Pentagon is in the midst of a review of its strategy in the Pacific. And according to reports in Israel, the US, which is pledged to assisting Taiwan's self-defense, has cut the Israeli government out of a new fighter-plane project, called the F-35, in protest at its arms sales to Beijing.
In these respects, it seems clear that the government-permitted anti-Japanese ructions are serving to remind Washington and Europe, as well as Beijing's neighbors, that China is much more than an economic opportunity. It poses a strategic challenge that could become everyone's problem.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
On May 13, the Legislative Yuan passed an amendment to Article 6 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) that would extend the life of nuclear reactors from 40 to 60 years, thereby providing a legal basis for the extension or reactivation of nuclear power plants. On May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators used their numerical advantage to pass the TPP caucus’ proposal for a public referendum that would determine whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should resume operations, provided it is deemed safe by the authorities. The Central Election Commission (CEC) has
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS