On March 14, 2005, China promulgated an "Anti-Secession" Law with a vote of 2,896 to zero at its National People's Congress. The Anti-Secession Law authorizes China to "employ and execute non-peaceful means" against Taiwan when the Chinese president deems necessary to bring Taiwan into their authoritarian fold.
The intended application of this law is clearly targeted at not only Taiwan, but the US.
The motivation and contents are nothing but barbaric, malicious, and peace-threatening. It is a revival of historical Chinese imperialism.
We could handle this situation in various ways. We could leave it alone. After all, it is a domestic Chinese law. The People's Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan in history. Nor does this law have any jurisdiction over Taiwan.
Unfortunately, this do-nothing approach may encourage China to continually bully Taiwan and misbehave on the world stage. It could lead to increased instability and military conflict in the western Pacific.
We should not underestimate China's propensity toward brutal aggression. China invaded and occupied Tibet in 1959 and killed more than one million Tibetans. China attacked India in October 1962 and held a hostile relationship with India for nearly two decades. China wants its people to forget about its invasion of Vietnam in February 1979 by erasing it from their official history.
But the Taiwanese should not forget. The deployment of more than 700 Chinese missiles aimed at Taiwan is a persistent threat to peace.
It appears that China was a peace-loving country when it was weak, and an arrogant and offensive one when it was strong.
But this new law could backfire. The Bush administration and Congress have expressed a heightened concern.
And the US has apparently imposed pressure on the EU, which is expected to delay its plan to lift the embargo of selling advanced weapon systems to China -- at least until next year.
Ultimately, a more pragmatic and peaceful approach is for the international community to re-evaluate the ever-popular "one-China" policy.
It is unrealistic and nightmarish, but most of all the "one-China" policy is detrimental to the Taiwanese people's fundamental right to self-determination, which has been trampled by various imperial powers since the early seventeenth century.
The international community should help foster negotiations between China and Taiwan so that peace across the Taiwan Strait can be ensured and further development advanced.
Donald Shih
St. Louis, Missouri
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past