Beijing's toughening line on Taiwan gives ammunition to the US in its bid to stop the EU lifting its arms embargo on China, analysts said Monday.
China's National People's Congress earlier adopted an "anti-secession" law which gives its military a "legal" basis to attack Taiwan if the country moves towards independence.
Washington described the move as "unfortunate," while the French foreign ministry said that EU countries were consulting about how to react.
"The Americans will take this opportunity to recall their opposition to a lifting of the EU arms embargo on China," said Adam Ward of the International Institute of Strategic Studies in London.
In December, the 25 EU heads of government restated their intention of lifting the ban, which was put in place after the crackdown on the democracy movement in the 1989 Tiananmen Massacre.
Last month US President George W. Bush used his European tour to put on record his opposition to a lifting of the embargo -- a position shared by the US Congress.
"China's move will give arguments to the United States which can now say -- look, there is another reason not to lift the embargo. There is a new proof that China is a threat to Taiwan," said Jean-Vincent Brisset of the Paris-based Institute for International and Strategic Relations.
"The US thinks lifting the embargo would be a blunder on many levels -- because of the human rights situation which still exists in China and in terms of the political signals it would send to Beijing on Taiwan," Ward said.
"There is a unique degree of unanimity in the US on this. They believe the risk of a conflict in the Taiwan Straits is not negligible," he added.
The Europeans see an end to the embargo as a chance to penetrate new parts of the Chinese market and to boost their sales of non-military goods, according to Brisset.
"The Europeans have their eye on the great Chinese market. As for the Chinese, they say: as long as you do not sell us arms, we will not buy your Airbus," Brisset said.
"But the Europeans do not realize what they are doing. Because the Chinese buy very little. They buy samples and manufacture their own counterfeits," he said.
For Yiyi Lu of the British research center Chatham House, "The Americans will of course bring the Chinese vote up at their discussions with the Europeans. They will say it is a new threat."
But the vote "will change little" because it was not a surprise, she said. Brisset agreed.
"This is nothing really new," he said, pointing out that the Chinese Communist party has repeatedly threatened to use force against democratic Taiwan.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
RSS