Lai I-Chong (賴怡忠) of the Taiwan Thinktank was in Chicago recently. He gave a speech regarding the "anti-separation law" after a 228 memorial concert. (The official Chinese translation is "anti-secession" law, which is a falsified translation for Chinese propaganda purposes.) One of his suggestions to counter the law was to enact a Taiwanese domestic law to declare Taiwan's sovereignty.
I agree with his point. My suggestion to him was to pass by means of a referendum a Taiwanese domestic law to declare Taiwan's sovereignty, and declare the People's Republic of China an enemy state. Anyone in Taiwan who assists China in violating Taiwan's sovereignty should be punished for high treason.
Declaring Taiwan's sovereignty is merely a statement of reality; it does not change the status quo. It is the "anti-separation" law that is attempting to change the status quo.
Such a law will not likely be passed in the current legislature, but if clearly phrased and understood by the voters, it could very likely pass the threshold for a referendum.
That China is an enemy state of Taiwan is more than evident. Such a statement, if passed, would put to rest once and for all the confusion in China and the rest of world, by clearly stating that Taiwanese do not want "unification" with the communist People's Republic of China.
Such a law should have teeth. There is no democratic country in the world in which citizens are free to betray their country's sovereignty.
The inexperience of the Democratic Progressive Party administration, which is eager to protect free speech and human rights, has led many traitors and Chinese agents to abuse their freedoms without fear of punishment. They are sowing confusion for the international community, and attempting to murder Taiwanese liberties.
The boundaries of free speech should be clarified: There is no freedom to betray one's country, nor freedom to infringe on others' freedom.
Unity in Taiwan will come when its purpose and the ways to achieve it are clear. In order to preserve their freedom, Taiwanese have to be involved, unite and know how to achieve their goals. To know how to counter China's aggression in every aspect of legal, diplomatic, psychological, military and propaganda warfare is the only way to preserve their freedom.
After all, Taiwan has the best weapons, which China cannot purchase: free speech and democracy. To prevent these rights from being abused takes wisdom and guts.
Chen Ming-chung
Chicago, Illinois
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor
RSS