Today, 26 NATO Heads of State and Government will meet at NATO Headquarters in Brussels. They are here to demonstrate a strong spirit of unity in the transatlantic community, a determination to look forward and take action together.
There are important questions to be addressed, not only about the direction of NATO's missions and operations, but also about the future of transatlantic security cooperation and the role the alliance will play.
The broad range of issues to be discussed mirrors the essential place of the alliance in addressing today's security challenges.
They will discuss how to reinforce the success the international community has had in helping to build a new, democratic Afghanistan.
NATO and its members are already providing the essential security Afghanistan needs in order to make its aspirations for self-sustaining peace and prosperity a reality. Today, NATO leaders will reaffirm their commitment to the courageous people of this country:?we will help them for as long as it takes.
Iraq is a case in point. All 26 NATO nations are now, as an alliance, working together to respond to the Iraqi government's request for support:?by training Iraqi security forces, by providing equipment, or by helping to fund NATO's efforts.
We are building a stronger relationship with the broader Middle East. Already, the alliance is developing a deeper political dialogue and more practical cooperation with the countries of North Africa, Israel and Jordan, and opening up a discussion with the Gulf States. When Condoleezza Rice made her first visit as Secretary of State to NATO headquarters two weeks ago, Alliance Foreign Ministers had a discussion about the Middle East Peace Process. The broader Middle East will be on the agenda of Heads and State and Government again today.
Many other critical political issues will be addressed:?from ensuring stability in Kosovo as the political situation evolves this year; to the importance of maintaining strong relations and a frank dialogue with Russia; to building a stronger relationship with the EU, one that maximises the complementarity between our two organisations; to supporting the new government in Ukraine as it finds its path. In that regard, this morning NATO leaders will welcome their first meeting with President Viktor Yushchenko.
They will share with him their common determination to help him build a better, more democratic future for his people, and strengthen Ukraine's Euro-Atlantic integration.
But NATO leaders will also lift their eyes from the immediate challenges of the day, and discuss a fundamental strategic question as well: how to use NATO to its fullest potential as a platform for holding political discussions and building transatlantic consensus across the wide range of the issues where Europe and North America share common interests and wish to defend common values.
NATO is the only permanent political forum in which North America sits together with Europe. This is a unique framework for profound transatlantic political consultation and effective military cooperation. And it works -- but it can do more. The alliance can and should be the place to discuss and debate a broader range of political issues.
Indeed, as we face today's security challenges -- terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, failed states -- we cannot afford not to. I am encouraged that, more and more, alliance leaders are coming to share the same view.
Today's Summit meeting will give a new impulse to NATO's political evolution. That evolution will accelerate in the coming months and years, as NATO strengthens its role in shaping and delivering transatlantic security cooperation in the 21st century.
Jaap de Hoop Scheffer is secretary-general of NATO.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS