In recent years, many experts and commentators have said that the Atlantic Alliance would crumble or become irrelevant. As a former ambassador to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), I can say from experience that such dire predictions are nothing new. As America's current Secretary of Defense, it is clear to me that the transatlantic partnership is as relevant and essential as ever.
Consider the historic events that have taken place in the past year and the role played by the US and Europe. NATO added seven new members -- nations eager to contribute to the Alliance in powerful ways. In Afghanistan, eight million voters, 40% of them women, chose their first democratically elected President in 5,000 years. In the Palestinian Authority, a democratically elected president offers the hope of a new chance for peace. In Ukraine, ordinary citizens demonstrated the depth of their commitment to free and fair elections.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
In Iraq, Saddam Hussein's former subjects braved threats and voted for the first time with ballots that offered a choice of 70 political parties, rather than only one. Across the country, voters arrived on crutches and in donkey carts, passing by posters that threatened: "You vote, you die." What a damaging blow to the extremists, whose ideology the voters so clearly rejected.
While there have been differences over Iraq, such issues among longtime friends are not new. Consider just a few of the divisions that have come up among NATO allies over the past decades. In the 1960s, France decided to pull out of NATO and to expel NATO from France. In the 1980s there was profound disagreement and controversy over President Ronald Reagan's decision to deploy medium-range missiles in Europe. In fact, as NATO Ambassador in the 1970s, I had to fly back to testify against legislation in the US Congress to withdraw America's forces from Europe in the middle of the Cold War.
Our Atlantic Alliance has navigated through some choppy seas over the years, but we have always been able to resolve the toughest issues. That is because there is so much that unites us: common values, shared histories, and an abiding faith in democracy.
Today, we also share a common enemy. Extremists have targeted all civilized societies across the globe: in New York and Washington; Istanbul; Madrid; Beslan; Bali; and more. They do not seek an armistice with the civilized world. They will not negotiate a separate peace. They would like nothing better than for America and Europe to be at odds, rather than working together.
The arrests of numerous terrorist suspects last month by French and German authorities made clear that no one nation can do the critical work necessary to win the struggle against extremists. Often quietly, America and European nations are sharing intelligence, capturing terrorists, and disrupting their finances. As a result, some three-quarters of known al-Qaeda leaders have been killed or captured, and others are on the run.
Nor can any one nation stop the proliferation of dangerous weapons. This is why some 60 nations have joined the Proliferation Security Initiative in an effort to keep deadly weapons from dangerous regimes. In 2003, German, Italian, British, and US authorities confiscated nuclear equipment bound for Tripoli, leading to Libya's decision to open its weapons inventories to inspectors.
Every NATO nation has personnel serving in the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan, which just changed command from a French to a Turkish general. One of NATO's newest members, Lithuania, is taking leadership of a Provincial Reconstruction Team -- joining other European nations in contributing to Afghanistan's stability and progress.
Indeed, more than half of all NATO nations have had forces in both Afghanistan and Iraq. As the Iraqi people take more steps along the challenging road to democracy, more NATO countries have agreed to help train Iraqi security personnel by providing funds or equipment and by establishing a war college and military academies.
Members of NATO share much more than an alliance; we are united by ties of blood and purpose, a heritage of liberty, and a calling to confront extremists' violence -- and defeat it.
In the 60 years since World War II came to an end, we have counted on each other in times of peril and challenge. I am old enough to remember both the rise and fall of the Berlin Wall, and the ascent and collapse of Nazism, of Fascism, and of Soviet Communism. Together the members of NATO have helped to protect Kosovo and recently brought aid to the victims of a devastating tsunami. Great achievements are possible when the Atlantic community is united.
That unity need not mean a uniformity of tactics or views, but rather a union of purpose.? Those who cherish free political systems and free economic systems share similar hopes. Working together, those hopes can become realities for many more people.
Donald H. Rumsfeld is US Secretary of Defense.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS