The stakes were high as Indonesia held talks yesterday in Finland with separatist rebels from its tsunami-hit Aceh province, but while concerns for disaster survivors may have brought them willingly to the table, analysts see little hope for lasting peace.
Before the killer waves came crashing ashore, resource-rich Aceh at the western tip of Sumatra had been the scene of a 28-year struggle by armed guerrillas who accused Jakarta of plundering the province's wealth.
The last attempt to reconcile the two sides at talks in Tokyo in May 2003 ended in abject failure as both sides failed to agree on an agenda, plunging the region into renewed conflict that has claimed several thousand lives.
Fears that the fighting could harm the massive international relief effort in Aceh, where most of Indonesia's 228,000 tsunami dead and missing lived, have prompted ceasefire calls from both sides and brought them to talks in Helsinki.
The initial signs are good, with Jakarta showing apparent sincerity by dispatching top ministers to the talks and leaders of the Free Aceh Movement, known as GAM, indicating from exile in Sweden that it will keep an open mind.
But ahead of the dialogue, the message from Jakarta has been mixed, with the president and his deputy sending conflicting signals even as the powerful military shows reluctance to relinquish its grip on what it has fought for.
With the Indonesian government stating from the outset that independence is not an option, it has little leverage, other than the goodwill it has generated in its post-disaster assistance and amnesties for surrendering rebels.
The rebels, who were blamed by Japan and the US for scuttling the earlier peace talks in Geneva in April 2003, have yet to state if they will accept an offer of autonomy, and if they will press home earlier, seemingly unworkable, demands for a national political role in Indonesia.
With the agenda unclear, observers say the Helsinki talks, hastily convened under the watch of former Finnish president Martti Ahtisaari, may only help formalize ceasefires declared after the disaster rather than secure lasting peace.
Hasballah Saad, an Aceh native and former human rights minister, said he had "little expectation" that the two sides could iron out their differences in the absence of a concrete agenda.
He said a temporary truce was unlikely to blossom into full-blown peace unless offers such as rebel disarmament and a government troops withdrawal are laid on the table.
"There should be a consensus to stop hostilities in the form of a permanent ceasefire. Afterwards, they should discuss what future steps that need to be taken," he said.
Kusnanto Anggoro, a political analyst from the private Center for Strategic and International Studies, was also pessimistic saying the two sides had "very little common ground."
"There is still a major outstanding problem. Indonesia seems to seek a short-term ceasefire while GAM wants a longer one. I do not expect the talks will bear fruit since they have not been planned properly," he told reporters.
Even if the rebel leaders strike a deal with Jakarta, Anggoro said, guerrillas on the ground in Aceh "do not necessarily listen to or follow" orders from their Sweden headquarters.
"They do not have a sound and an established communication. There are too many factions within GAM in Aceh and it's quite possible that soldiers in the forests will not heed deals made by their leaders," he added.
According to one Western diplomat in Jakarta, the military too may renege on government promises as it seeks to continue a major offensive that has allowed it to turn Aceh into its personal, and highly lucrative, fiefdom.
President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, who has previously backed a non-military solution in Aceh, this week made potentially inflammatory remarks calling for a stronger military, saying that with better firepower the rebels may now have been crushed.
His comments, Saad said, raise suspicions that Jakarta's backing of the talks is merely a cynical ploy to raise the president's profile as he marks his first 100 days in office.
Further gloom was piled on by Indonesian assembly speaker Hidayat Nur Wahid, who suggested that the failure of talks in Geneva and Tokyo showed the futility of trying to negotiate overseas through third parties while the issue lay at home.
"Since the Aceh problems are an internal matter, it would be much better if [the talks] are held in Indonesia because this would certainly generate a positive impact," Wahid said.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS