The stakes were high as Indonesia held talks yesterday in Finland with separatist rebels from its tsunami-hit Aceh province, but while concerns for disaster survivors may have brought them willingly to the table, analysts see little hope for lasting peace.
Before the killer waves came crashing ashore, resource-rich Aceh at the western tip of Sumatra had been the scene of a 28-year struggle by armed guerrillas who accused Jakarta of plundering the province's wealth.
The last attempt to reconcile the two sides at talks in Tokyo in May 2003 ended in abject failure as both sides failed to agree on an agenda, plunging the region into renewed conflict that has claimed several thousand lives.
Fears that the fighting could harm the massive international relief effort in Aceh, where most of Indonesia's 228,000 tsunami dead and missing lived, have prompted ceasefire calls from both sides and brought them to talks in Helsinki.
The initial signs are good, with Jakarta showing apparent sincerity by dispatching top ministers to the talks and leaders of the Free Aceh Movement, known as GAM, indicating from exile in Sweden that it will keep an open mind.
But ahead of the dialogue, the message from Jakarta has been mixed, with the president and his deputy sending conflicting signals even as the powerful military shows reluctance to relinquish its grip on what it has fought for.
With the Indonesian government stating from the outset that independence is not an option, it has little leverage, other than the goodwill it has generated in its post-disaster assistance and amnesties for surrendering rebels.
The rebels, who were blamed by Japan and the US for scuttling the earlier peace talks in Geneva in April 2003, have yet to state if they will accept an offer of autonomy, and if they will press home earlier, seemingly unworkable, demands for a national political role in Indonesia.
With the agenda unclear, observers say the Helsinki talks, hastily convened under the watch of former Finnish president Martti Ahtisaari, may only help formalize ceasefires declared after the disaster rather than secure lasting peace.
Hasballah Saad, an Aceh native and former human rights minister, said he had "little expectation" that the two sides could iron out their differences in the absence of a concrete agenda.
He said a temporary truce was unlikely to blossom into full-blown peace unless offers such as rebel disarmament and a government troops withdrawal are laid on the table.
"There should be a consensus to stop hostilities in the form of a permanent ceasefire. Afterwards, they should discuss what future steps that need to be taken," he said.
Kusnanto Anggoro, a political analyst from the private Center for Strategic and International Studies, was also pessimistic saying the two sides had "very little common ground."
"There is still a major outstanding problem. Indonesia seems to seek a short-term ceasefire while GAM wants a longer one. I do not expect the talks will bear fruit since they have not been planned properly," he told reporters.
Even if the rebel leaders strike a deal with Jakarta, Anggoro said, guerrillas on the ground in Aceh "do not necessarily listen to or follow" orders from their Sweden headquarters.
"They do not have a sound and an established communication. There are too many factions within GAM in Aceh and it's quite possible that soldiers in the forests will not heed deals made by their leaders," he added.
According to one Western diplomat in Jakarta, the military too may renege on government promises as it seeks to continue a major offensive that has allowed it to turn Aceh into its personal, and highly lucrative, fiefdom.
President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, who has previously backed a non-military solution in Aceh, this week made potentially inflammatory remarks calling for a stronger military, saying that with better firepower the rebels may now have been crushed.
His comments, Saad said, raise suspicions that Jakarta's backing of the talks is merely a cynical ploy to raise the president's profile as he marks his first 100 days in office.
Further gloom was piled on by Indonesian assembly speaker Hidayat Nur Wahid, who suggested that the failure of talks in Geneva and Tokyo showed the futility of trying to negotiate overseas through third parties while the issue lay at home.
"Since the Aceh problems are an internal matter, it would be much better if [the talks] are held in Indonesia because this would certainly generate a positive impact," Wahid said.
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
RSS