At a time when Taipei is thinking over its international strategy in response to Beijing's proposal of an anti-secession law (反分裂國家法) last month, several local academics and experts have predicted that China will make concessions on direct cross-strait charter flights for the Lunar New Year holiday -- as this would constitute just a single, insignificant case.
In doing so, China will be able to affect Taiwan's international strategy: just as Taipei is firing back at the proposed legislation, it will be accepting a symbolic reconciliation between the two sides when Chinese charter flights arrive in Taiwan.
Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) took the initiative by first making a statement on May 17 on the anti-secession law, and he is no longer responding passively to Taiwan's moves. Meanwhile, he is playing a soft tune on non-political issues to attract the support of the Taiwanese people and the international community.
When Koo Chen-fu (辜振甫), the late chairman of the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF), fell seriously ill last year, Taipei wished to invite the chairman of China's Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS), Wang Daohan (汪道涵), to visit him. Beijing thinks highly of Koo, and clearly knows that another Koo-Wang meeting could have reduced tensions across the Strait. But Beijing repeatedly refused Taipei's invitation, due to its rigid political stance.
The condolence message Wang sent after Koo's death is a reflection of their personal friendship. But it also shows that, if the necessary moral courage is absent, one will be destined to yield to Beijing's strategic arrangement.
China's creation of the anti-secession law shows that Hu wants to take the initiative to restrain Taiwan from a plan to create a new constitution through a referendum next year. China has been preparing the legislation for a long while, but claims that the proposed law is passive and defensive. China is obviously trying to prevent not only formal Taiwan independence, but also US interference.
After hurting the feelings of the Taiwanese people with this strategic arrangement, a ray of hope over charter flights has appeared. Unfortunately, Beijing's political maneuvering can be seen behind its goodwill.
According to a poll on the anti-secession law taken by the pro-independence Taiwan Thinktank on Dec. 31, more than half of those questioned think that the law may restrict their expression of opinion on unification and independence, block the resumption of cross-strait talks and even increase tension across the Strait. About 70 percent of the respondents think that Taiwan's international space will be further oppressed.
About 80 percent of respondents objected to the legislation, while as many as 88 percent thought that Taiwan's political parties should give up their power struggles in the face of the legislation. Perhaps it is beyond Beijing's imagination that the law might promote unity among Taiwan's major parties.
Although Taipei wants to strike back, it is under pressure from Washington. But if no action is taken, this will be interpreted as tacit recognition of Beijing's action.
Taipei has purposely defined Beijing's move as an attempt to unilaterally change the status quo. US President George W. Bush's government did not criticize Beijing for the proposed law, unlike its response to Taipei's holding of a so-called defensive referendum last year.
Ironically, Taipei now has to swallow the insult, accept the delayed charter flight plan designed by Beijing and study the proposed two-way direct flights between Taiwan and Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. Although Taipei is relatively passive at present, it should at least express its opinion on the planning of destinations for the flights. That would be fair play.
The cross-strait situations seems hopeless and depressing at times. But it is full of all kinds of possibilities and turning points. Real peace is surely impossible. But it is not easy for a war to break out either. Both sides have to seize this opportunity and make every effort to boost the economy. Besides, at least Taiwan, China and the US do have something in common: avoiding the use of force in the Strait.
After the Lunar New Year charter flights, and to mark the 10th anniversary of former Chinese president Jiang Zemin's (江澤民) "eight points" on the Taiwan issue, Hu may call on the two sides to jointly build a framework for cross-strait peace and stability.
Despite a few methods proposed to improve cross-strait relations (such as negotiation mechanisms and convenient charter flights for passengers and cargo), there is still a very long way to go reach true reconciliation. The charter flights give only minor relief in a situation of major tension. Although they will have no significant impact on the overall framework, we hope that such tiny drips can in the end break this stone.
At a time when China is using the dual tactics of tightening its stance on major issues while loosening it on minor ones, Taiwan is planning to establish a committee for cross-strait peace and development. Since the Taiwanese people are tired of inter-party struggles, the government should unite with the opposition and social elite to seek reconciliation, and give full play to professionalism. This is also how we can pay our supreme respects to Koo, who was the real advocate of the committee.
Lin Cheng-yi is the director of the Institute of European and American Studies at the Academia Sinica.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
On May 13, the Legislative Yuan passed an amendment to Article 6 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) that would extend the life of nuclear reactors from 40 to 60 years, thereby providing a legal basis for the extension or reactivation of nuclear power plants. On May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators used their numerical advantage to pass the TPP caucus’ proposal for a public referendum that would determine whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should resume operations, provided it is deemed safe by the authorities. The Central Election Commission (CEC) has
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS