The best news from Ivory Coast in recent weeks is that there hasn't been much news. After French soldiers destroyed the pitiful Ivorian Air Force -- two aged jets and a few helicopters -- in a revenge rampage last month, it seemed the country was tipping into the type of civil war that Africa has seen too often: a nation tearing itself apart while a "peacekeeping" army of its former colonial masters waits benignly in the wings.
That depressing post-colonial cliche should not be applied to Ivory Coast -- despite the efforts of the lazier sections of the media.
When fighting broke out in the north of the country, against those opposed to President Laurent Gbagbo's government, the UK news headlines were unequivocal. "Ivory Coast descends into chaos" (the London Times) and "Paratroopers and tanks move in to quell Ivory Coast unrest" (Daily Telegraph) followed the bombings that killed nine French soldiers in early November.
As tensions rose and the French carried out "revenge" attacks, the bellicose coverage continued.
"We fled machete mobs," blared the London Sunday Times on Nov. 14 summoning up the dark heart of Africa for readers safely home in Britain.
So far, so bad. But of course the story didn't stop there. As France's peacekeeping turned sour, the Africa Union stepped in to reinvigorate the country's power-sharing and peace process. South Africa's president Thabo Mbeki travelled north on behalf of the union earlier this month, and was met by cheering crowds.
"We want to clear the way for a better life for everyone in Ivory Coast," Mbeki said, reported by the Associated Press. Here was a good news story, of African countries cooperating to solve the problems in their own backyard. After all the tales of looting, rape and murder, was this optimistic note sounded in the British press? Not a word.
When it comes to those countries of site for "peace breaks out" news is calorie-free. Even the announcement this month, that things had calmed down enough to allow France to withdraw 1,000 troops, did not make it into the papers.
Ivory Coast is a perfect example of the misrepresentation of Africa in the West's eyes. Other than the Ivorian footballers drafted into European teams, the country hardly rates a mention. Yet far from being an economic basketcase, Ivory Coast was one of the success stories of modern sub-Saharan Africa. Not only is it the world's major producer of cocoa, but besides South Africa it can boast the best infrastructure and most sophisticated economy on the continent.
Ivory Coast's post-independence growth followed a period of stability under its first president, the dictator Felix Houphouet-Boigny, since the country ceased to be a colony in 1960. But that stability has come under threat, as the grip of strong men such as Houphouet-Boigny and his successor Henri Bedie weakened.
Both men favored the predominantly Francophone and wealthy Christian south of the country, and were happy to allow France to retain its colonial prerogatives, dressed up as partnership, into the modern era.
That cosy pattern was disrupted in 1999, as the ham-fisted Bedie provoked deep unpopularity and was later deposed by the Ivorian army.
The coup appeared to herald a greater degree of democracy, especially in voting rights for the country's huge immigrant population and the status of their offspring.
The nationality issue had come to a head over the status of Alassane Ouattara, the talented technocrat who was barred from running in the 1995 presidential election by Bedie, on the grounds that he was a foreigner -- which Ouattara hotly disputes.
Stripped of his Ivorian citizenship in 1999, Ouattara is popular in the north of the country. That area has been in the hands of the New Forces rebels since 2002. It is a sign of the optimism following Mbeki's intervention that the painful issue of "Ivorianess" -- the xenophobic policy of populist nationalism -- may be resolved. But Gbagbo remains the key to any peace deal. So far he has proved adept at out-maneuvering the French.
Ironically, the French generally turned a blind eye to "Ivorianess" when it was deployed against political rivals such as Ouattara. But when Gbagbo's paramilitary supporters -- the appropriately named Young Patriots -- began targeting foreign French citizens, France became more violent. The result was French soldiers in Abidjan firing into an unarmed group of protesters early in November, killing some 50 to 60 civilians.
France initially denied the shootings, but eventually put the death toll at 20. In an echo of the 1958 Sakiet crisis -- when French bombers attacked a village in Tunisia said to be harboring Algerian guerrillas -- there are calls for international investigations into France's bloody reprisals. No wonder some have called Ivory Coast "France's little Iraq."
Meanwhile, the Africa Union has restarted the peace process, as the dregs of France's influence in Africa ebbs away. If all this good news keeps up, we may hear little more from Ivory Coast for years.
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS