New evidence is emerging on almost a weekly basis to link rises in man-made carbon dioxide in the atmosphere with the real and immediate threat that global climate change presents to our environment, people and communities.
Earlier this year, scientists published a study in the journal Nature that indicated that many plant and animal species are unlikely to survive climate change. Their analyses suggest that 15 percent to 37 percent of a sample of 1,103 land plants and animals would eventually become extinct as a result of climate changes expected by 2050.
YUSHA
And earlier this month, 300 scientists contributing to the Arctic climate impacts assessment warned that Arctic temperatures have risen by almost twice the global average over the past 50 years. This increase looks set to continue, with a further rise of between 4℃ and 7℃ possible by 2100.
The rise in Arctic temperatures is already impacting heavily on people and wildlife. Buildings from Russia to Canada have collapsed because of subsidence linked to thawing permafrost, and mammals such as polar bears and seals have been affected.
We know the global temperature has now risen by between 0.6℃ and 0.7℃ over the past century. Globally, the 1990s were the hottest decade, and 1998 was the hottest year since our records began in 1861. Moreover, the seven hottest years since 1861 all fell in the 1990s.
Around the world, glaciers are thinning and in retreat and sea levels are rising. During the 20th century, the sea level rose by 10cm to 20cm, and global snow cover has diminished by 10 percent since the 1960s.
Carbon dioxide levels are at their highest ever and set to increase. Natural effects alone, such as El Nino, could not have caused that increase. It is a result of man's action in burning up reserves of carbon at a rate that has never been exceeded before.
The atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide has risen by almost 30 percent since the Industrial Revolution. Both the current concentration of about 379 parts per million (ppm) -- compared with 280ppm in the pre-industrial era -- and the current rate of increase of approximately 2ppm annually, are the highest since the last ice age.
The planet has not experienced comparable concentrations for at least 740,000 years -- and probably for many millions of years.
The Greenland ice sheet was retreating at a rate of around 1m a year in 2001, according to a NASA study. The latest study indicates it is moving back at about 10m a year. If the Greenland ice sheet were to melt, the sea level would rise by between 6m and 7m. That would create a major problem for coastal cities.
More intense rainfall events are expected to be a feature of climate change. If we do not prepare for these, the impacts could be significant. We already know the power and devastation that can be unleashed on our communities by extreme weather. In 2002, severe floods in Europe caused 37 deaths and had an estimated direct cost of US$16 billion.
According to the Association of British Insurers, 2000 was the wettest UK autumn for almost 300 years, with heavy rainfall leading to damage to 10,000 properties and nearly ?1 billion in insurance claims.
During the heatwave last year, 14,000 people died in France, while the death toll across Europe reached 30,000. This was the worst natural disaster in Europe in 50 years. Statistical analyses show, with 90 percent certainty, that roughly half of the severity of this hot summer can be attributed to global warming.
It is essential that we act now to mitigate these effects. However, further climate change over the next two to three decades is inevitable, due to past and present carbon dioxide emissions. We must also, therefore, adapt to ensure that we can manage the additional risks associated with these impacts.
The good news is that we now understand what is happening and therefore what we must do to address this. Global action to reduce carbon emissions is the key.
Put simply, we must radically reduce the amount of greenhouse gases we produce (mainly carbon dioxide generated through mankind's use of fossil fuels) and explore other possible alternatives such as renewables, hydrogen and fusion.
There is as yet no consensus on what constitutes dangerous climate change, or at what level greenhouse gas concentrations should be stabilized to avoid it. In 1997, the EU supported the case for limiting temperature rise to no more than 2?C above pre-industrial levels, and a target level of lower than 550ppm of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which is about twice the pre-industrial concentration.
More recent research, however, has suggested that a level as low as 450ppm to 500ppm of carbon dioxide may be needed to meet a 2?C limit.
The UK is taking a lead. British Prime Minister Tony Blair has made clear that climate change will be a top priority for the UK's G8 and EU presidencies. A key event in preparing for our G8 summit will be a scientific conference next February to tackle questions such as the impacts that might be expected at different levels of temperature rise.
The recent approval of the Kyoto protocol by Russia will do much to re-invigorate the international climate change process.
Ratification of Kyoto presents a raft of business opportunities and an unprecedented opportunity to accelerate the move to a low carbon economy. It will also provide a platform for the UK and EU to lead by example.
The time is right for action, and it must be taken quickly. We have the technologies to deal with this -- or the scope to develop them. Action is affordable. Inaction is not.
Sir David King is scientific adviser to the UK government. On Monday he was awarded the WWF/Media Natura Award at the British Environment and Media Awards for his role in raising awareness of climate change.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers