No one who lived through the horrors of former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein's regime, from whose ruins the new Iraq is emerging, will ever forget them. It is one of the reasons that the elections to be held in January -- the first time most Iraqis will have had the chance of a meaningful vote -- have such wide support in the country.
The very notion of a free and fair vote for ordinary citizens was an abomination to Saddam. He and his cronies tortured and murdered their fellow Iraqis if they so much as hinted at dissent.
These elections, in which the Iraqi people will decide not just who will govern them but how they are governed, show the country is emerging from this nightmare. They should be supported by all who wish Iraq well. What do those who claim to have the best interests of Iraq at heart fear from elections?
Iraqis are striving to construct a society where freedom of choice, the democratic process and the rule of law are paramount.
They want, as they continually tell me and my colleagues in the Iraqi interim government, freedom, peace and stability for their children.
No one should be able to deny them this dream. But a small minority of Saddam loyalists and foreign terrorists who have nothing to offer but violence are trying to do just that.
They exist in various parts of Iraq, but their base has been Fallujah for some time.
From this city, they have terrorized the local population and spread murder across the country. They have blown up women and children and executed in cold blood fellow Iraqis trying to end the lawlessness in our country. No civilized person can stand by and allow this to continue. No civilized person should support those behind this campaign of murder.
The people of Fallujah do not support these men of violence. They want rid of them and have been pleading for the interim government to free them. It would have been better for everyone if this could have been done peacefully.
So for many months, Prime Minister Ayad Allawi and my colleagues in the interim government have made repeated efforts to negotiate a peaceful resolution.
We have stopped at nothing to persuade the terrorists and insurgents to lay down their arms, stop hurting innocent Iraqis and spare the city from further military action. We have continually said that the political process remains open to those who renounce violence. It still does.
The terrorists and insurgents have refused our advances, preferring instead to continue fighting. Finally the interim government had no other option than to take this action to liberate the people of Falluja from these murderers and protect the people of Iraq from further atrocities. I wish there had been another way.
But we need to resolve the situation and quickly. The real aim of these terrorists, as well as causing as much destruction as possible, is to derail the national elections planned for January. They know the more successful these elections are, the less space there will be for their nihilistic brand of violence.
Given the current security climate, holding free and fair elections on time poses a huge challenge. But delaying the elections would pose a greater danger to the country's future.
By the end of January, Iraqis should have had the chance to elect a national assembly, 18 provincial governors, and the Kurdistan national assembly. The country's ethnic and religious diversity will for the first time in Iraq's troubled history be properly reflected in its political institutions.
These elections will show that the entire Iraqi population, minus the small group of violent people, want a better future. They will demonstrate that we want, as people throughout the world do, a choice in how our country is run, and who runs it.
Terrorists and extremists will not let up in their campaign to derail the political process in Iraq. Motivated by hatred and tyranny, they cannot tolerate Iraq's transformation towards a federal democracy. But we in the interim government cannot tolerate their violent contempt of basic human rights and their attempts to destroy Iraq.
We also expect the international community to actively support Iraqis in this battle against terrorism and extremism. We have to be realistic and accept that the resolution of the situation in Falluja will not eradicate the plague of terrorism in Iraq, but it will deny terrorists the command center and refuge they have enjoyed for so many months.
It is also hoped that restoration of the rule of law to Falluja will pave the way for improved security and allow full participation in the elections by a larger section of the Sunni Arab community who live there.
Iraq has the chance of a new, better future. It will require a great deal of courage, hard work and dedication to help bring it about. But because this future is what the Iraqi people are determined to grasp, no matter what the sacrifice, it will happen.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS