Having just gotten back to Taiwan after two years overseas it's nice to see that not much has really changed.
An earthquake and typhoon in my first week back, legislators on the news behaving like children while throwing things at each other, and Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-Jeou's (
However one thing that really should have changed during these last two years has somehow managed to remain the same.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Lien Chan (
Does this man have no shame? You would have thought that two election defeats would be enough to convince even the most arrogant person that they just haven't got what it takes to win.
As if coming a disappointing third place four years ago wasn't enough, a second attempt, running in tandem with the ever-popular People First Party Chairman James Soong (
It's about time he realized that all the political science degrees and English skills in the world won't help you win an election if you lack charisma -- and sadly, this is Lien's downfall.
He may be rich and a powerful figure within the KMT, but he is about as exciting as a wet weekend in Keelung.
Simply put, he has no voter appeal. Instead of blaming himself, he attributed his defeats to former president Lee Teng-hui (
Look at the US and this week's presidential poll for an example of how this quality can work. US President George W. Bush has been a disaster for the US and the rest of the world.
He also lacks many personal qualities, but even he has charisma and he uses this to appeal directly to his supporters.
Lien should also look at the US and take a leaf out of Senator John Kerry's book.
Instead of starting conspiracy theories and encouraging civil disorder in a bid to cover up his election shortcomings, he should concede defeat gracefully and be content with a back seat role within the KMT.
Only then will he be behaving like the statesman he so desperately wants to be.
And maybe then he might finally earn the respect and popularity he desires from the electorate.
Richard Hazeldine
Sindian
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS