US Secretary of State Colin Powell's visit to Beijing has produced both good news and bad news for Taiwan.
The bad news is largely superficial, while the good news is more substantial. Balancing it all out, Taiwan has probably come out ahead.
Taiwan's media, especially the United Daily News has overemphasized Powell's statement about Taiwan not enjoying sovereignty as a nation and the US' rejection of Taiwan independence. But at the same time, Powell referred to President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) as Taiwan's president. If Taiwan is not a sovereign nation, how can it have a president?
As far as the affirmation that Taiwan is not a sovereign nation and the US' rejection of Taiwan independence, Powell has not departed from the US' "one China" policy. He has simply been more explicit, with the aim of showing goodwill to his Chinese hosts. For Taiwan, this must be counted a loss.
But this loss is balanced by gains. Powell insisted to Beijing that the US had an obligation to maintain the Taiwan Relations Act, according to which the US pledges to ensure that Taiwan has adequate defensive capabilities. More importantly, one of the key issues of Powell's visit was the proposed arms sale to Taiwan, an issue on which Powell made no concessions whatsoever.
Even as Powell stated that the US rejects the idea of Taiwan independence, Washington is willing to arm Taiwan to resist the threat of forcible unification through invasion. The US rejects independence in the words it uses, but in its actions it arms Taiwan with defensive weapons.
Is China really the winner from the two-pronged US policy? Not necessarily.
The most amusing response was from Chang Jung-kung (張榮恭), the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT's) spokesman. He said that Powell's statement was a response to Chen's attempt to hide behind the shell of the Republic of China (ROC) in order to promote Taiwan independence.
But the point is that the US has long since ceased to accept the existence of the ROC and for that reason there is a Taiwan Relations Act and not an "ROC Relations Act." The fact that Powell emphasized that the US did not accept Taiwan independence indicates that the death sentence has already been passed on the ROC.
Establishing diplomatic relations with China in 1979 was the US way of dragging the ROC out to be shot. For Powell, the ROC does not exist anymore, so there can be no ROC "shell" to speak of.
As to whether Taiwan is a sovereign nation, this is totally unrelated to the ROC. So the KMT, which is wedded to the idea of the ROC, is totally unable to even become involved in the debate over Taiwan. The main point is what Taiwan's 23 million people want.
Senior adviser to the president Koo Kwang-ming's (辜寬敏) advertisement in the Washington Post and the New York Times has already raised a voice against the US' "one China" policy. The thaw is already beginning.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS