In 2001, the US offered Taiwan a cheaper alternative to the current plan to purchase eight new diesel-electric submarines. Last year, the US Department of Defense also pitched the option of buying refurbished submarines from a third country, but the offer was rejected by Taiwan's Ministry of National Defense.
Also last year, the US approached Italy to purchase used SSK (Type 1081) Sauro-class diesel-electric attack submarines. The Italian Ministry of Defense tentatively agreed but Taiwan rejected the offer, insisting on new platforms. The original plan called for the US to purchase four submarines, then refurbish and resell them to Taiwan.
Four additional submarines would be made available as Italy decommissioned them. Once refurbished, the Italian submarines would be good for 15 years, and the deal included an extension program, a US defense source has said.
With dramatic political opposition to the budget, many in the US are hoping Taiwan reconsiders this option. The option was put forth in light of the massive cost and political opposition to building new submarines. First, the eight new submarines alone are estimated to cost between NT$237 billion to NT$372.5 billion (US$7 billion to US$11 billion) with delivery in 2013. In contrast, eight used submarines would be sold at an estimated cost of NT$67.7 billion (US$2 billion) with delivery beginning in 2006-2007.
Taiwan's refusal to consider an option which is cheaper and gives it defense capability sooner rather than later demonstrates the lack of creative thinking on this issue. The result is an extraordinarily expensive solution that detracts from other pressing needs, US sources say.
Italy has already decommissioned one Sauro-class submarine, the S-518 Nazario Sauro, and is preparing to decommission three more: the S-519 Carlo Fecia Di Cossato, the S-520 Leonardo Da Vinci and the S-521 Guglielmo Marconi. Four additional submarines -- making up the Salvatore Pelosi-class and Primo Longobardo-class -- are expected to be decommissioned within the next 10 years. The Pelosi-class are enlarged Sauros armed with Harpoon anti-ship missiles. Longobardos-class subs are enlarged Pelosis, with improved weapons storage, sensors and range.
The Sauro-class submarines have a displacement of 1,479 tonnes surfaced and 1,657 tonnes dived; are 63.9m long, with a beam of 6.8m, draught of 5.7m. They also have a maximum speed of 11 knots surfaced, 19 knots dived, with a range of 17,702km. Armament includes six 533mm bow tubes.
Once refurbished with the latest weapons and equipment by a US defense contractor, they would be as good as anything China currently has in its docks.
The source said that the third-country option is not limited to Italy. Other countries, including India and Russia, were suggested as options.
Opponents to the procurement of refurbished submarines cite the logistical requirements involved in maintaining older submarines. However, the defense source notes that Taiwan has a proven ability to maintain and build submarines.
The best examples are Taiwan's two World War II-era Guppy-class, and the two Hai-lung (Sea Dragon)-class (originally Zwaardvis-class) submarines. The Guppys are the oldest submarines used by any navy in the world.
To make things worse, veteran US navy sailors who served upon the two Guppys would like Taiwan to return the submarines to the US for display in a museum.
Wendell Minnick is the Taiwan correspondent for Jane's Defence Weekly.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS