After a dozen years of stagnation, Japan's economy seems to be looking up. But appearances can deceive. Despite improvements and reforms, many of Japan's fundamentals remain woeful.
Japan's decline has been palpable. In the late 1980s, it was fashionable in some Japanese policy circles to argue that the Pax Americana was over, to be replaced in Asia by Pax Japonica. America's economy seemed to be tanking, Japan's was soaring, and projections favored next year as the date when it would overtake the US. That things have turned out far differently reflects Japan's inertia.
ILLUSTRATION: YU SHA
The problems underlying Japan's decline are legion. Japanese policymakers and business leaders do not understand the concept of "creative destruction." Too many industrial dinosaurs are kept on life support. So, although some firms do extremely well -- say, Toyota and Canon -- there is little space for new ventures and entrepreneurs. If Japan's economy were a computer, it would have a hard disk full of obsolescent programs and a "delete" button that doesn't work.
No matter what criterion one uses, Japan's economy remains the most closed among Organization for Economic Community Development (OECD) countries and one of the most closed in the world. Not only is foreign capital conspicuously absent, but so are foreign managers, workers, intellectuals, and ideas. Universities, think tanks, and the media are for the most part insular institutions.
Similarly, while non-government organizations (NGOs) are a dynamic component in most societies nowadays, Japan has few, and major international NGOs are nonexistent or have only a weak presence. Oxfam, one of the world's leading NGOs, with offices and branches all over the world, is absent altogether.
The closed nature of Japanese society and the dearth of ideas are partly attributable to the linguistic barrier. Where Japan really falls short is in English -- the global language, and thus the main purveyor of global ideas. In Asia, Japan ranks above only North Korea in scores on the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL).
Moreover, Japan's demographics are among the worst in the world. In this respect, Europe is not much better, although its current restrictive immigration policies will likely be eased over the next decade or so. No such assumption can be made about Japan, where an aging population will intensify the closed and intellectually arid nature of its society.
As a major trading power, Japan should be a leading player in the WTO and in trade forums. Yet despite being one of the main beneficiaries of the post-World War II open and multilateral trading system, Japan stands out as a retrograde mercantilist state.
Isolation has brought confusion about Japan's place in the world. While Japan's government lobbies hard to get a permanent seat on the UN Security Council, its Prime Minister regularly flouts Asian opinion by paying his respects to war criminals at the Yasukuni Shrine. Apart from the immorality of such public behavior (imagine a German chancellor paying his respects at Goebbels' grave!), the fact that both China and the US have veto power at the UN suggests that it is stupid even from the standpoint of Realpolitik.
Indeed, relations with China are Japan's most profound problem. Japan's emergence as East Asia's leading power in the 19th and early 20th centuries involved three brutal wars in China, in which the Japanese army committed dreadful atrocities. The 1949 communist takeover in China, the Cold War, America's adoption of Japan as its pampered protege, and the failure to prosecute Emperor Hirohito for war crimes, allowed Japan to avoid a moral reckoning. Now, as China rises and Japan declines, the old, deep-seated suspicions, tensions, and distrust are resurfacing.
Japan's grim outlook is bad news for the world because it is the globe's second leading economic power. Prospects for Japan acting as a global economic locomotive and of playing a role in poverty reduction and economic development are, for now, almost nil. Indeed, Japan's growth is being driven overwhelmingly by trade with China -- a country with only one-thirtieth of Japan per capita GDP!
From a broader geopolitical perspective, the situation becomes alarming. Despite its frequent economic booms, Asia is also a strategic and security minefield. A sclerotic, atavistic, nationalist, and inward-looking Japan can only aggravate the situation.
What should Japan do? The only solution for Japan is to open up -- not only its economy, but its society, its universities, its media, its think tanks, and, indeed, its bars and bathhouses. Many young Japanese -- often the brightest and most entrepreneurial -- demand to live in an open society, but the option they are choosing now is emigration.
An open Japan would, by definition, be more outward-looking, would speak better English so that it could communicate across Asia and the world, would be more influenced by foreign ideas -- including ideas concerning war guilt. It has been 150 years since the "black ships" of the US Navy forcibly opened up Japan. Today, the Japanese must open up their country themselves.
Jean-Pierre Lehmann is professor of international political economy and founding director of The Evian Group.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS